Quantcast
Channel: Accused or charged – Sylvia's Site
Viewing all 1993 articles
Browse latest View live

Get them out of the priesthood

$
0
0

I’ve just posted a series of articles updating the Father Carlos Urrutigoity/Paraguay scandal:

30 July 2014:  “Vatican Taking Action In Divisive Paraguay Diocese Where Top Priest Was Removed” & related articles   (RC Scandal/Other Countries/Paraguay)

I erred :(  With the first round of reports I mistakenly thought that decisive action had been taken regarding Father Urrutigoity.

Not so.

Father Urrutigoity has not been suspended.  He has been relieved of his duties as Vicar General of the Diocese of Ciudad del Este in Paraguay.  That’s it.  He is still very much a priest in that diocese.

What’s the point?  What is gained by relieving a clerical predator of his duties as Vicar General of a diocese if he’s still functioning as a priest in the diocese, is a priest ‘in good standing,’  and is probably hearing confessions, giving spiritual advice and offering up the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass?

This is nonsense.

And look at this. The bishops in Paraguay are reduced to duking it out – in public – over Father Urrutigoity:

The Archbishop of Asuncion, Eustaquio Pastor Cuquejo, called for a new investigation into the Rev. Urrutigoity. Bishop Livieres was so outraged that he claimed at a public rally that Archbishop Cuquejo was nearly removed from the church five years ago for homosexual behavior, calling him “a bad person” who shouldn’t “throw stones.”

Are Lievre’s allegations against the Archbishop true?  I have no idea, but, if yes,the archbishop should be gone too.  All of them:  Archbishop Eustaquio Pastor Cuquejo, Bishop Rogelio Livieres and Father Carlos Urrutigoity. Laicize them for goodness sake.  Get them out of the priesthood.

As for the hold on ordinations, I thought that that was probably tied into Father Dominic Carey being in charge of the seminary.  Father Carey, born and raised in Vancouver British Columbia,  was, along with Father Urrutigoity, a member of the scandal-plagued and now suppressed Society of St. John.  Father Carey actively defended the SSJ priest’s habit of sleeping with boys and explained it as opportunity to bond.   I believe that any priest so ready and willing to defend the indefensible  is unfit to be a priest, never mind assist in the formation of future priests.

Is that why ordinations in the diocese are on hold?  I thought so, but am not so sure any more.  If Father Urrutigoity – who ‘bonded’ with I don’t know how many young lads and molested/assaulted others -  has merely been demoted from  VG to diocesan priest, why be concerned with a priest who simply condones the ‘bonding’ experience, and defends those accused of molesting?

Where does this go?

My hopes aren’t too high at all.  At the very least Father Urrutigoity could have been suspended pedning a thorough investigation.  Thorough!    Let those who deny or question the allegations against him talk to those with first-hand information of the going on at St. Greg’s and then at nearby Shahola Pennsylvania where Urrutigoity and his fellow members of the Society of St. John established themselves.

How many are there out there who are blind and can not see?

Enough for now,

Sylvia

 

 

 

 

 


“Nunavut ex-priest heads back to court, this time in Alberta”& related articles

$
0
0

Eric Dejaeger faces two sex-related charges from late 1970s in Edmonton

NUNATSIAQ NEWS

31 July 2014

Eric Dejaeger, on May 26, being lead into the Nunavut Court of Justice in Iqaluit. (FILE PHOTO)
Eric Dejaeger, on May 26, being lead into the Nunavut Court of Justice in Iqaluit. (FILE PHOTO)

Eric Dejaeger, the disgraced and defrocked priest who is currently in custody awaiting verdicts in 68 sex-related charges stemming from incidents in Igloolik between 1978 and 1982, will face a new judge soon, in Edmonton.

The Canadian Press is reporting that Dejaeger waived his right to a preliminary hearing this week and will return to an Edmonton courthouse Sept. 12 to have a trial date set.

Dejaeger, 67, lived in Edmonton in the mid-1970s and studied at Newman Theological College before heading north to work as an Oblate missionary in what was then the Northwest Territories.

He was charged in 2011 with one count each of indecent assault and gross indecency in connection with a series of incidents involving a minor alleged to have occurred in Edmonton between 1975 and 1978.

The Belgian-born ex-priest, who now holds Canadian citizenship, has a long history with the Canadian justice system.

He was sentenced in 1990 to five years in prison after pleading guilty to sex offences arising from incidents against males and females in Baker Lake in the late 1980s.

His most recent trial in Iqaluit, which involved weeks of emotional testimony from 41 complainants — 21 male and 20 female — unfolded over seven months. He originally faced 80 charges; he pleaded guilty to eight and four charges were dismissed due to lack of evidence.

That lengthy trial wrapped up in May. Justice Robert Kilpatrick, who is hearing the case alone, without a jury, has reserved his decision on those charges.

_______________________

Former priest Eric Dejaeger to go to trial in Edmonton on sex charges

CBC News

Posted: Aug 01, 2014 5:52 AM CTLast Updated: Aug 01, 2014 5:52 AM CT

 Former priest Eric Dejaeger will go to trial in Edmonton on charges of indecent assault and gross indecency after waiving his right to a preliminary inquiry on Thursday.

Priest North Justice

Former priest Eric Dejaeger leaves an Iqaluit courtroom in January 2011. Dejaeger will go to trial in Edmonton on charges of indecent assault and gross indecency after waiving his right to a preliminary inquiry. (Chris Windeyer/Canadian Press)

A lawyer representing Dejaeger, 67, appeared in an Edmonton courtroom.

The charges relate to incidents alleged to have occurred in Edmonton between 1975 and 1978 when he was studying at Newman Theological College.

Dejaeger will have his trial date set on Sept. 12.

Dejaeger is awaiting the verdict from his recent trial in Iqaluit. He’s charged with dozens of sex offences against children in Igloolik, Nunavut stemming from incidents alleged to have occurred during his time as a priest in the community three decades ago.

_____________________________

Former Arctic priest to face Alberta trial on sex charges

The Canadian Press

July 31, 2014 11:37 AM

Eric Dejaeger is escorted by police outside an Iqaluit, Nunavut courtroom Jan. 20, 2011. The former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Windeyer

EDMONTON – A former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton.

Eric Dejaeger has waived his right to a preliminary hearing and will have his trial date set on September 12.

The 67-year-old former Oblate missionary lost his status as a priest for his behaviour in two missions in Nunavut.

Dejaeger was stationed in Igloolik and Baker Lake between 1978 and 1989, when the Oblates asked him to leave.

He lived in Edmonton during the mid-1970s after moving from Belgium.

He was studying at Newman Theological College during his time in the Alberta capital.

_________________________________

Former priest Eric Dejaeger to go to trial in Edmonton on sex charges

Canada MSN News   North West Territories

Fri, 01 Aug 2014 07:52:55 GMT | By CBC News, cbc.ca


Catholic priest Eric Dejaeger leaves an Iqaluit, Nunavut courtroom Jan. 20, 2011 after his first appearance for six child sexual abuse charges in Igloolik dating back to the 1970s. He must have thought he was through with Canadian prisons.Father Eric Dejaeger probably figured as recently as last spring that he'd never have to answer to accusations he'd betrayed the faith and innocence of Inuit children from the tiny Nunavut community of Igloolik. Chris Windeyer/Canadian Press

Catholic priest Eric Dejaeger leaves an Iqaluit, Nunavut courtroom Jan. 20, 2011 after his first appearance for six child sexual abuse charges in Igloolik dating back to the 1970s. He must have thought he was through with Canadian prisons.Father Eric Dejaeger probably figured as recently as last spring that he’d never have to answer to accusations he’d betrayed the faith and innocence of Inuit children from the tiny Nunavut community of Igloolik. Chris Windeyer/Canadian Press

Former priest Eric Dejaeger will go to trial in Edmonton on charges of indecent assault and gross indecency after waiving his right to a preliminary inquiry on Thursday.

A lawyer representing Dejaeger, 67, appeared in an Edmonton courtroom.

The charges relate to incidents alleged to have occurred in Edmonton between 1975 and 1978 when he was studying at Newman Theological College.

Dejaeger will have his trial date set on Sept. 12.

Dejaeger is awaiting the verdict from his recent trial in Iqaluit. He’s charged with dozens of sex offences against children in Igloolik, Nunavut stemming from incidents alleged to have occurred during his time as a priest in the community three decades ago.

Former Arctic priest to face Alberta trial on sex charges

The Canadian Press
July 31, 2014 11:37 AM

Eric Dejaeger is escorted by police outside an Iqaluit, Nunavut courtroom Jan. 20, 2011. The former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Windeyer

EDMONTON – A former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton.

Eric Dejaeger has waived his right to a preliminary hearing and will have his trial date set on September 12.

The 67-year-old former Oblate missionary lost his status as a priest for his behaviour in two missions in Nunavut.

Dejaeger was stationed in Igloolik and Baker Lake between 1978 and 1989, when the Oblates asked him to leave.

He lived in Edmonton during the mid-1970s after moving from Belgium.

He was studying at Newman Theological College during his time in the Alberta capital.

- See more at: http://www.nanaimodailynews.com/news/former-arctic-priest-to-face-alberta-trial-on-sex-charges-1.1270332#sthash.44n5uAdf.dpuf

Former Arctic priest to face Alberta trial on sex charges

The Canadian Press
July 31, 2014 11:37 AM

Eric Dejaeger is escorted by police outside an Iqaluit, Nunavut courtroom Jan. 20, 2011. The former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Windeyer

EDMONTON – A former Arctic priest defrocked for sexual misbehaviour will face trial on two sex-related charges in Edmonton.

Eric Dejaeger has waived his right to a preliminary hearing and will have his trial date set on September 12.

The 67-year-old former Oblate missionary lost his status as a priest for his behaviour in two missions in Nunavut.

Dejaeger was stationed in Igloolik and Baker Lake between 1978 and 1989, when the Oblates asked him to leave.

He lived in Edmonton during the mid-1970s after moving from Belgium.

He was studying at Newman Theological College during his time in the Alberta capital.

- See more at: http://www.nanaimodailynews.com/news/former-arctic-priest-to-face-alberta-trial-on-sex-charges-1.1270332#sthash.44n5uAdf.dpuf

This isn’t sitting right

$
0
0

As anticipated, there was no preliminary hearing on Dejeaeger’s Edmonton charges in Edmonton yesterday.  So, here’s the latest on the prolonged scandalous saga of ex-priest, Oblate, convicted clerical molester and former fugitive from justice Eric Dejaeger omi.  :

31 July 2014:  “Nunavut ex-priest heads back to court, this time in Alberta” & related articles

As it stands, this isn’t quite sitting right with me, because, as it stands the date to set a trial date in Edmonton (12 September 2014) happens to be the same date as the tentative date set for the verdict on the Nunavut charges (12 September)

Here are my thoughts:

(1)  True enough, Justice Robert Kilpatrick set the 12 September 2014 date as tentative.  The judge apparently said that he has a lot of material to go through and would issue his decision as quickly as possible.  It’s highly possible therefore that he is prepared to render verdict in a week or two.  However, once the verdict is rendered arrangements will have to be made for Victim Impact Statements to be read, and the sentencing hearing.  If psychological profiles and reports on Dejaeger’s propensity to re-offend and so on are requested by either side arrangements will have to be made for those to be done.

And then there’s the sentencing itself .

Can all of this be accomplished by 12 September?  I suppose it’s possible, depending of course on such things as when Justice Kilpatrick renders his verdict, and how many victims want to give a Victim Impact Statement, and whether or not victims will have opportunity to appear in person in court to read their statements.

I just doubt that there will be anything happening in Edmonton before the Nunavut charges are wrapped up.

Did the Crown in Edmonton discuss the 12 September 2014 date with the Crown handling the Nunavut charges?  I don’t know.  But, even if 12 September is a tentative date it strikes me that it’s odd that the same date was picked for the Edmonton court date.

But, perhaps there is knowledge that by 12 September Dejaeger’s sentencing in Nunavut will be over and done with?  therefore, perhaps things can proceed in Edmonton on that date?

(2)  But, here is my other line of thought…

Is it possible that there is a plan to merge the Edmonton charges with those in Nunavut?

Is it possible that Dejaeger has been offered a sweet deal whereby he will plead guilty to the Edmonton charges and in return has his sentence  lumped in with the Nunavut sentencing?

And is it possible that on 12 September Dejaeger will answer to the Edmonton charges in  Nunavut?  In that case I suppose there would be some legalities entailed in the transfer, but it’s happened elsewhere and can be done, but then it would be on to an agreed statement of facts and his guilty plea.

IF that were to happen the guilty pleas from Edmonton would be lumped in with those in Nunavut (he entered guilty pleas to eight of 80 charges) and with all convictions on the remaining Nunavut charges.

And, IF this is the way it’s going to happen would the Edmonton complainant (s) be flown to Iqaluit for the guilt plea and Victim Impact Statements?  I personally think that every victim should have opportunity to see his/her molester face to face in court, and that every victim should have opportunity to read his/her Victim Impact Statement in the presence of his/her molester.     The victim must surely have some rights?   If decisions are made by the powers that be to merge charges with those of another jurisdiction then surely the victim is not automatically denied this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity?

I just don’t know.    These charges pre-date his ordination in 1978.  I just hope and pray that at the 11th hour the Edmonton charges aren’t lumped in with those in Nunavut, and that if unfortunately through a sweet deal they are, that the Edmonton victim (s) will be offered the option of being flown to Iqaluit to see Dejeager plead guilty, and the option of  reading a Victim Impact Statements in person in Dejaeger’s presence.

Please, as always, keep the many many Dejaeger victims and complainants in your prayers.  They need your prayers.

Enough for now,

Sylvia

“Paraguay diocese says accused priest came with Ratzinger OK”& realted articles

$
0
0

CathNews New Zealand

Tuesday, August 5th, 2014

A diocese in Paraguay says a priest accused of abuse in the United States was placed in ministry at then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s recommendation.

Bishop Rogello Livieres Plano incardinated Fr Carlos Urrutigoty in Ciudad del Este diocese in 2005, where he was later appointed vicar-general.

Recently the Vatican suspended ordinations to the priesthood in the diocese, following an apostolic visitation ordered by Rome.

The diocese subsequently defended itself, saying Fr Urrutigoity “came recommended by some cardinals with functions in the Holy See (one of them, elected a few days later Successor of Peter)”.

The Vatican, through the apostolic nuncio, and “with the consent of the excardinating bishop”, authorised the incardination, the diocese stated.

A diocesan review board in Scranton found an abuse allegation credible a decade ago.

Fr Urrutigoity’s alleged offending involved an adult, not a child, the diocese maintained, so his case was never referred to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Bishop Plano has always believed him to be innocent.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was to become Pope Benedict XVI.

________________________________

Paraguay: diocese defends bishop, says Cardinal Ratzinger recommended accused priest

CatholicCulture.org

01 August 2014

Catholic World News – August 01, 2014

The Diocese of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay, has published an aggressive defense of the leadership of Bishop Rogelio Livieres Plano, claiming that a priest who had been accused of abuse in the US was placed in ministry on the recommendation of then-Cardinal Ratzinger.

Bishop Livieres incardinated Father Carlos Urrutigoity, who had been accused of sexual abuse in Pennsylvania, into his diocese in 2005. The diocese stated that the priest “came recommended by some cardinals with functions in the Holy See (one of them, elected a few days later Successor of Peter).” In 2005, Bishop Joseph Martino of Scranton suppressed the Society of St. John– which had been known for its promotion of the extraordinary form of the Mass, but also criticized for reports of lavish spending– following accusations of sexual abuse against its founder, Father Urrutigoity. Bishop Martino’s predecessor, Bishop James Timlin, had suspended Father Urrutigoity’s faculties after a diocesan review board found an abuse allegation credible. In defending Bishop Livieres, the Paraguayan diocesan website stated:

  • In 2004, Paraguay’s bishops wrote to Pope St. John Paul II to protest his appointment of Father Livieres, a priest of Opus Dei, to the diocese, but the Holy See held firm.
  • Bishop Livieres was the only bishop who publicly opposed the presidential candidacy of former bishop Fernando Lugo, who governed the nation from 2008 to 2012.
  • Opposition to Bishop Livieres among religious orders intensified when he forbade the “political or ideological instrumentalization” of their work and when he called for the proclamation of the Gospel to indigenous peoples.
  • Ten priests from his diocese, and 150 from across the nation, urged Pope Benedict XVI to remove the bishop after he sought to “renew ecclesial discipline.” Today, however, the vast majority of the diocese’s “young and numerous” clergy support him.
  • Bishop Livieres faced opposition from his brother bishops after he founded a major seminary and minor seminary in the diocese, thus ending the “monolithic scheme of priestly formation” at the national seminary.
  • Father Urrutigoity “came recommended by some cardinals with functions in the Holy See (one of them, elected a few days later Successor of Peter).” The Vatican, through the apostolic nuncio, and “with the consent of the excardinating bishop,” authorized the incardination.
  • The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith did not investigate the accusation against Father Urrutigoity because he was not accused of sexual abuse with a minor, but of an action involving an adult. The bishop is convinced of the priest’s innocence.
  • In time, Father Urrutigoity was subsequently appointed vicar general: he was the “almost unanimous” choice of clergy and laity who had been consulted.
  • Following the election of Pope Francis, Paraguay’s leading prelate, Archbishop Eustaquio Pastor Cuquejo Verga of Asunción, asked the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to open a new investigation into Father Urrutigoity despite the lack of any new evidence.
  • Bishop Livieres has also faced opposition for admitting new religious and lay communities into the diocese and for using a grant to fund the education of seminarians.

The diocese also stated that since 2004, the number of priests has risen from 79 to 140, even though 51% of aspirants to the seminary are not admitted. The number of baptisms rose from 9,543 (2004) to 21,556 (2013). “The growth and strength of the people of God in Paraguay were cruelly mutilated” by the suppression of the Jesuit missionaries in the late 18th century, the diocesan statement concluded. “Those who are betting that history will repeat itself now in our diocese” may encounter the “surprise of discovering that, this time, the Bishop of Rome is an heir to those Jesuits calumniated and suppressed.”

The strong defense of Bishop Livieres comes as the diocese awaits the final result of a Vatican-ordered investigation led by Cardinal Santos Abril y Castello. The cardinal advised Bishop Livieres immediately to suspend priestly ordinations in the diocese; he is now making a full report of his findings to Pope Francis, who will determine any further action.

Clerical molesters and confreres dead

$
0
0

Two convicted Basilian molesters  are dead.

Convicted Basilian clerical molesters and confreres William Hodgson Marshall and Father Robert Whyte csb are dead.

Both taught at St. Michael’s College School  in Toronto  in the early 50s.   Both were at Assumption College in Windsor Ontario in latter part of the  same decade.  Both have been living at the Cardinal Flahiff Basilian Centre in Toronto  for years (Whyte since shortly after his 1990 conviction and subsequent incarceration, and Marshall since around 1998 following his return from St. Lucia.)

Marshall, who pled guilty June 2011 to 17 charges related to sex abuse of 17 victims was sentenced to two years in jail.  Some time after his guilty plea he was laicized/defrocked.  .  He continued to live in the Basilian residence in Toronto after his laicization.

Whyte, who pled guilty in 1990 to 18 charges of sex abuse of boys aged 11 to 17, was sentenced to four years in prison.

The pair died six days apart.

Father Robert Whyte csb died 22 July 2014

William Hodgson Marshall died 28 July 2014.

Both have gone to stand before their Maker.  They stood before Him on their own – no Andrew Brady there to argue their cause.  Each answered to the Judge who knows their every thought and deed.

I do pray that both had a change of heart and earnestly begged God for forgiveness for the pain they have inflicted on so many.  I don’t wish an eternity in Hell on anyone, not even my worst enemies.  God’s will be done.

That said, there is a surprising dearth of information on their deaths.  I have searched in vain for obituaries.  I did find the following notice on Father Whyte

22 July 2014:  Father Robert Whyte, C.S.B Obituary

And that’s it.  I can not find anything anywhere on Hod Marshall’s death.  I did confirm and get the date by calling the Basilian Centre.

As I hunted online I noticed that the Basilians are now restricting access to their information online.  I suppose it was all getting a tad too embarrassing? I can’t imagine why else an order would suddenly ban the general public from accessing its newsletters newsletters?

If anyone has access or links to obituaries on either of the two please send it along.

Keep these molesters’ many many victims and their families in your prayers.

 A special thank you to siobhan for letting us know of the death of William Hodgson Marshall

*****

The next court date for former Church organist Brian Lucy  is:

29 August 2014:  9 am, “to be spoken to,” courtroom #1,  Brockville, Ontario courthouse, (41 Court House Square)

That date relates to the two charges of breaching his bail conditions and a possession of child porn charge.

There is no news as yet on the sex abuse charges for which he has been committed to stand trial in Ontario Superior court.  I checked, and, as yet there is no news.  It usually takes a while for things to start rolling again after charges are moved to the Superior Court of Justice.  I will check again in about two weeks.

Enough for now,

Sylvia

 

Retired Windsor priest and sex offender dies

$
0
0

CTV Windsor

Published Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:51PM EDT

Last Updated Wednesday, August 6, 2014 3:04PM EDT

Convicted pedophile back in Windsor court

A retired Windsor priest convicted of several sex offences has died.

CTV News has learned that Father William Hodgson Marshall has died, he was 92. Marshall pleaded guilty to 17 counts of indecent assault against former Windsor, Toronto, and Sudbury students.

Marshall also pleaded guilty in 2013 to sexually assaulting two Saskatoon boys in 1959 and 1961. He received a sentence of six months in the community, to be served at the Cardinal Flahiff Basilian Centre in Toronto.

Marshall admitted in June 2011 to sexually abusing 17 young people and sentenced to two years in prison. In October 2012, Marshall was qualified for statutory release, serving a total of 16 months in jail.

Marshall was a teacher at Windsor’s Assumption College and the founding principal of Holy Names high school.

‘Glad he is gone,’ says victim as pedophile priest Hod Marshall passes away at 92

$
0
0

The Windsor Star

Aug 06, 2014 – 10:07 PM EDT

Last Updated: Aug 06, 2014 – 10:41 PM EDT

Dave Battagello

A 1985 file photo of Rev. William Hodgson Marshall in Windsor, Ont. (Randy Moore / The Windsor Star)

A 1985 file photo of Rev. William Hodgson Marshall in Windsor, Ont. (Randy Moore / The Windsor Star)

A 1985 file photo of Rev. William Hodgson Marshall in Windsor, Ont. (Randy Moore / The Windsor Star)

A former Basilian priest and Windsor Catholic high school teacher found guilty of a lengthy history of abusing male students passed away last week in Toronto at the age of 92.

William Hodgson (Hod) Marshall, pleaded guilty in 2011 to 16 counts of indecent assault of minors and one count of sexual assault for incidents that occurred between 1952 and 1986.

The incidents occurred while Marshall taught at Assumption and Holy Names high schools in Windsor, plus other Catholic high schools in Toronto and Sudbury.

“I have been dealing with pain and suffering this person put on me for the last 60 years,” said Jerry Boyle, 74, a victim who suffered abuse starting at 14. “There is some relief. It is one more page in the book closed.

“There are no tears falling for that man. I can assure you, that’s not part of what I’m feeling at all. I’m glad he is gone.”

Marshall, a gym teacher, was accused of sexually touching his students under the guise of checking their muscles, but the groping progressed to their genitals.

Court evidence detailed how he abused children — the youngest was seven years old — in his office, in school showers, in dormitories and the church rectory. Victims told of other priests walking in on the assaults, but never reporting what they saw.

He was given the nickname “Happy Hands” in the 1950s for his tendency to touch students.

Marshall also pleaded guilty in 2013 to sexually assaulting two Saskatoon boys in 1959 and 1961.

He was sentenced to two years in a federal penitentiary for his crimes, then later, another six months of house arrest for the charges out of Saskatchewan. He served a total of 16 months behind bars before being released in October, 2012 on probation.

He was reported to have died in Toronto on July 28.

A spokesman for the Diocese of London on Wednesday referred comment about Marshall to the Congregation of St. Basil, known as the Basilian Fathers.

A message left by The Star for Rev. Timothy Scott, spokesman for the Congregation of St. Basil, was not returned.

Marshall himself asked to be removed from the priesthood, a request granted by the Pope in late 2013, Scott told The Star earlier this year.

But Marshall, who had been fighting cancer for years, continued to reside at Cardinal Flahiff Basilian Centre in Toronto, a home for retired and infirm priests, following his release from prison.

Scott told the Star in late 2012: “We have indicated from the beginning that once he had completed the custodial sentence, we would be providing a place for him to live in prayer and penance to the end of his life.”

Boyle, who grew up in Windsor, but today resides in Cambridge, didn’t tell anybody of his sexual abuse by Marshall until 2010 when he was finally ready to talk to police in Windsor and was “shocked” at that time to learn Marshall was still alive.

Boyle was present in the courtroom in 2011 when Marshall read a prepared statement following his guilty plea that showed little remorse for his actions.

“I’ve heard more emotion from a weather forecast than what he came out with,” Boyle said. “For him, it was ‘get it over with.’

“This was an evil person who for many decades was protected by a system that moved him around, giving him new victims to choose from without supervision. That’s more painful to me as anything.”

Marshall’s actions remain fresh in the minds of his many victims since it was only recently he had to answer to the sexual abuse charges during court appearances in 2011 and 2013, said Brenda Brunelle, local spokeswoman for SNAP (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests).

“I want to congratulate the people who did come forward and speak out against all the crimes this person committed,” she said. “It’s because of their strength that inspired others to come forward (adding to charges against Marshall).

“He had his day in court, he was guilty and sentenced. Now he is laid to rest and buried as Father Hod Marshall — the pedophile.”

The Ontario College of Teachers, following a hearing over a year ago, announced last December it had found Marshall guilty of professional misconduct and ordered his teaching certificate be revoked as he “brought shame and disrepute to the profession through his abuse of power and sexual exploitation of students.”

dbattagello@windsorstar.com

Two filipino priests suspended in Newfoundland

$
0
0

I mentioned some days back that there were  two priests suspended and under investigation by police.

The Bishop notified one group of parishioners a week ago, but not the others.

The two priests are from the Diocese of Grand Falls, Newfoundland.  Both are from the Philippines and arrived in the Newfoundland diocese around 2010.

CBC put out the name of one, Father Richard Salas, about six days ago.

The other is Father Lloyd Lugtu. Father Lugtu was serving the parishes of Bonavista and Port Union.

I spoke to Father Lugtu on 24 July 2014.  He was in Toronto Ontario. He denied that he had been suspended and denied that he was under investigation by police.

On that same day (34 Kuly) I spoke to the secretary at Father Salas’s parish in Gander.  She had no idea that Father Salas had been suspended and was under investigation.

Bishop Anthony Daniels has not returned my calls or responded to my emails.

More to come.  For now, the following article from CBC:

Gander priest under RCMP investigation, relieved of duties

CBC News

Posted: Aug 04, 2014 12:05 PM NTLast Updated: Aug 04, 2014 12:08 PM NT

 A Roman Catholic priest in central Newfoundland has been relieved of his duties with the church and is under investigation by the RCMP.

Richard Salas, 44, originally from the Philippines, was the parish administrator at St. Joseph’s in Gander.

Church parishioners were told of his removal during weekend services.

The church did not elaborate on why Salas is being investigated by police.

It is believed Salas is currently vacationing in the Philippines.

And, yes, Father Salas is ‘vacationing’ in the Phillipines – he is supposed to be gone for two months.

I will be posting pages for each of the two with the little information I have been able to round up on each.

And, yes, in case you are wondering, the investigation is regarding allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of both priests.

Please keep the complainant (s), and any and all families impacted by these allegations  in your prayers.   Ditto the parishioners.

Enough for now,

Sylvia


Salas: Father Richard Salas

$
0
0

Filipino priest with the Diocese of Sorsogon. Philippines.  Ordained 2002.  Arrived in the Newfoundland diocese around 2010 and serving in the Diocese of Grand Falls, Newfoundland .

June or July 2014:  Suspended by bishop and under investigation by RCMP.  The investigation relates to allegations of sexual assault.  Suspended around the same time and also under investigation is Father Lloyd Lugtu, also from the Philippines.

_______________________________

Bishops of the Diocese of Grand Falls Newfoundland since Father Lugtus arrival: Martin William Currie (12 December 2000  – 01 March 2011 Resigned to become Archbishop of Saint John’s NL full time );  Robert Anthony Daniels (1 March 2011  – )

______________________________

The following information is drawn from Canadian Catholic Church Directories (CCCD) which I have on hand and information online as identified

10 July 2014Fathers Richard Salas & Lloyd Lugtu shown as priests “active”  in Gander Diocese (this list was posted 10 July 2014.  I beleive this was after the two priests were suspended)

Shown in diocesan website as Administrator of St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Church, Gander, Newfoundland (Father Richard Salas 10 July 2014 )  I believe Father Salas was already under investigation and had been suspended when this was posted on the diocesan website.

2014:  Administrator, St Joseph’s Roman Catholic Church, Gander, Newfoundland (diocesan website)

- listed on Diocese of Sorsogon website as “On Pastoral Work Abroad.”  (Diocese of Sorsogon July 2014 extra pages )

10 July 2014 – 11 August 2014Fathers Lloyd Lugtu and Richard Salas listed as priests active in diocese Grand Falls  (my understanding is that both priests were suspended before 10 July 2014.

2013:  Administrator, St Joseph Roman Catholic Church, Gander, Newfoundland (CCCD)

-  head of the Gander Filipino Association (scroll down to media)

08 February 2012Father Salas guest speaker at Ecumenical Fellowship Breakfast, Bethel Pentecostal Church Hall, Gander – to speak about Christianity in the Phillipines

2012, 2011, 2010:  Pastor or administrator (?):  St Joseph Roman Catholic Church, Gander, Newfoundland, with mission in Glenwood, Newfoundland (CCCD)

 

____________________________________

Gander priest under investigation

The Gander Beacon

05 August 2014

Father Richard Salas is still listed as Parish Administrator for St. Joseph’s Roman Catholic Parish, Gander, but he is no longer ministering to the congregation.

RCMP Logo

The Bishop for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Falls, Most Rev. Robert Anthony Daniels, confirmed for tc• Media that Father Salas is under investigation by the RCMP in Gander.The Bishop declined to comment on the matter under investigation, directing the media to the RCMP for information.He did say, however, that Father Salas was withdrawn from public ministry several weeks ago.Sgt. Phil Matthews of the Gander RCMP said he is unable to fully discuss the matter at this time, but did confirm Father Salas has been under investigation following the RCMP receiving a complaint more than a month ago.The investigation is ongoing.                                      info@ganderbeacon.ca         

Twitter: @beaconnl

_________________________

Gander priest under investigation

The Western Star

05 August 2014

Father Richard Salas is still listed as Parish Administrator for St. Joseph’s Roman Catholic Parish, Gander, but he is no longer ministering to the congregation.

The Bishop for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Grand Falls, Most Rev. Robert Anthony Daniels, confirmed for tc• Media that Father Salas is under investigation by the RCMP in Gander.

The Bishop declined to comment on the matter under investigation, directing the media to the RCMP for information.He did say, however, that Father Salas was withdrawn from public ministry several weeks ago.Sgt. Phil Matthews of the Gander RCMP said he is unable to fully discuss the matter at this time, but did confirm Father Salas has been under investigation following the RCMP receiving a complaint more than a month ago.The investigation is ongoing.info@ganderbeacon.ca

Twitter: @beaconnl

___________________________

Gander priest under RCMP investigation, relieved of duties

CBC News

Posted: Aug 04, 2014 12:05 PM NT

Last Updated: Aug 04, 2014 12:08 PM NT

 A Roman Catholic priest in central Newfoundland has been relieved of his duties with the church and is under investigation by the RCMP.

Richard Salas, 44, originally from the Philippines, was the parish administrator at St. Joseph’s in Gander.

Church parishioners were told of his removal during weekend services.

The church did not elaborate on why Salas is being investigated by police.

It is believed Salas is currently vacationing in the Philippines.

___________________________________

A Filipino Christmas in Newfoundland and Labrador

Away from home but still with family

The Prince Albert Daily Herald

Published on December 25, 2013

Brandon Anstey

Lorna Casapao dreamed of a white Christmas while living in the Philippines. Now after five years in Newfoundland and Labrador, the dream may have gone cold but her undying Christmas spirit hasn’t faded a bit.

JOLLY CHRISTMAS – Lorna Casapao appreciates the joys of the holiday season. Family, she said, is most important.

Ms. Casapao left the Philippines in 2009 to come to Newfoundland and Labrador in an attempt to provide better support for her family back home.  The white Christmas she had dreamed of turned into reality not long after touching down in Newfoundland.“We enjoyed the snow the first time we came here, but after three months we thought it was so cold,” laughed Ms. Casapao. “It’s been almost five years now and we’re not used to this kind of weather.”She noted the differences in Christmas traditions in Newfoundland and Labrador and the Philippines.“The most unique thing about the way Newfoundlanders (and Labradorians) celebrate Christmas is the way they treat us,” said Ms. Casapao. “We are far from our families and homes in the Philippines, but they treat us like we are no different than them.”Ms. Casapao is an employee of the McDonald’s Restaurant in Gander and said it was there she realized the value people in this province place on inclusion and family. The managers, she said, made her feel right at home.“They treated us like family, even though we’re not related or blood. They kept telling us blood is not what matters, as long as you have a heart-to-heart, you’re family.”

The humble Ms. Casapao spoke of the different meal traditions of both her new and native home. Here, she said, the meals are usually turkey or Jigs dinner. In the Philippines, one of the main Christmas meals is Lechon. It is a national dish of the Philippines that features an entire pig roasted over charcoal. The meal is typically part of large festive celebrations.

The traditions, she said, are very similar in both places. There is much emphasis placed on the religious aspect of Christmas, said Ms. Casapao.

“For example, grandma and grandpa would come over and we grab their hands for a blessing, and they give each other gifts.”

Filipinos also celebrate, Simbang Gabi. It’s a tradition that includes early morning masses from Dec. 16 up to Christmas Eve.

“We always go to church and we complete the eight days,” she said.

Just like in Newfoundland and Labrador, singing is a big part of the Christmas celebrations in the Philippines, said Ms. Casapao.

“Kids go the houses of neighbours and start caroling,” she said. “We give them coins and candy and things like that. It’s the Christmas spirit the kids live for.”

Newfoundland parents and Filipino parents share another Christmas tradition, said Ms. Casapao.  Parents hang stockings for their children on Christmas Eve.

“They say if you have been a good boy or girl, Santa will bring you a gift,” she said.

While she hasn’t been home to the Philippines since leaving, she stays in close contact with her family through the Internet.

“We do communication through Skype because the long-distance calls cost a lot of money,” said Ms. Casapao.

Even though she won’t be home this Christmas, she will still be with family, she said.

“We are having a Filipino party this year through the Gander Filipino Association.”

The organization is headed by Reverend Richard Salas of the Catholic Church in Gander. The association hosts parties for newcomers and existing members on a regular basis.

Ms. Casapao said her favourite part of it all is the different parties that take place during the holiday season. It’s there she feels most connected and at home.

“We have found family here,” she said.

banstey@ganderbeacon.ca

 

Lugtu: Father Lloyd Lugtu

$
0
0

Filipino priest with the Diocese of  Tariac,  Philippines.  Ordained 08 May 1999 .   Arrived in the Newfoundland and serving in the Diocese of Grand Falls around 2010.

June or July 2014:  Suspended by bishop and under investigation by RCMP. The allegations are allegedly those of sexual assault.  Father Lugtu was suspended around the same time as Father Richard Salas, also from the Philippines, and also being investigated by the RCMP.

Canon lawyer.  Serving on diocesan marriage tribunal

_______________________________

Bishops of the Diocese of Grand Falls Newfoundland since Father Lugtus arrival: Martin William Currie (12 December 2000  – 01 March 2011 Resigned to become Archbishop of Saint John’s NL full time );  Robert Anthony Daniels (1 March 2011  – )

 

__________________

The following information is drawn from Canadian Catholic Church Directories (CCCD) which I have on hand and information online as identified

10 July 2014Fathers Richard Salas & Lloyd Lugtu shown as priests “active”  in Gander Diocese (this list was posted 10 July 2014.  I believe this was after the two priests were suspended and under investigation)

Shown in diocesan website as Administrator of St Joseph’s & St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Church in Port Union, Newfoundland Roman Catholic Church (Father Lloyd Lugtu  10 July 2014.  I believe Father Lugtu was already under investigation and had been suspended when this was posted on the diocesan website.

2013:  Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as a  Associate Judicial Vicar  (CCCD)

2012:  Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as Defender of the Bond (CCCD)

- greetings on Radio Mari Philippines on occasion of anniversary of his ordination (Father Lugtu Radio Maria Philippines)

2011: Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as a Judge (CCCD)

July 2010:  Is in  Newfoundland and seems to have been assisting at the Immaculate Conception Cathedral, Grand Falls Diocese (Father Lugtu in Newfoundland July 2010)

2010:  Not listed in index (CCCD)

date ?:  at some point prior to departure for Newfoundland served as parish priest in Tarlac (LFather Lloyd Lugtu pastor in Philippines)

Maria Divina Pastora Parish (F-2006)
Address: Balutu, Concepcion 2316 Tarlac, Philippines
Titular: Maria Divina Pastora,

Parish Priest:  Father Lloyd Lugtu
Parish Priest: Father Lloyd Lugtu

Undated:  Listed as “Advocate” with the diocesan marriage tribunal in Diocese of Tarlac

08 May 1999:  ORDAINED

studied theology at the Pontifical University of Santo Tomas (external link to page)

lived at the Our Lady of Peace Formation House while pursuing studies for ordination for the Diocese of Tarlac in the Philippines

________________________________

 PARISHIONERS GIVE SEMINARIANS FINANCIAL SUPPORT, MOTHERLY CARE

UCANews.com

Philippines

July 29 1998

Laypeople in a Quezon City parish offer both financial help and motherly care to 13 financially pressed seminarians from the northern Philippines doing their theology studies in Manila.

Remedios Samala, a leading sponsor at Hearts of Jesus and Mary Parish, recently received the Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice papal award especially for her help to the seminarians of Tarlac diocese, 110 kilometers northwest of Manila.

Samala donated 50,000 pesos (US$1,200) to Our Lady of Peace Formation House, where the seminarians live, from sponsors of her award investiture alone, said Monsignor Orlando Panlican, rector at the center.

“Aside from this, the formation house has received more or less 139,000 pesos in addition to our monthly supply of eggs, longaniza (native sausage) and other food supplies,” he added.

While the widow, a native of Tarlac province, has been a liaison between the center and prospective benefactors, “her greatest help for the formation house is her motherly concern for our needs,” said Monsignor Panlican.

“She is very active in the life of the foundation house, visiting us often,” said Lloyd Lugtu, at 24 the oldest seminarian at the center.

The second of four children of a teacher and her engineer husband, Lugtu recalled how “very happy” his parents were when he decided to enter the seminary, but they could not pay for his studies without help.

Lugtu, who studied theology at the Pontifical University of Santo Tomas (UST), has lived at the formation house for five years. He awaits his priestly ordination next year.

Another seminarian at the center, Peter de la Cruz, recalls how the seminarians once stayed at Samala´s house “when the electricity at the formation house was cut off because we weren´t able to pay our bill.”

The third of four children of a retired electrician and his unemployed wife, de la Cruz, 23, is also studying theology at UST as he anticipates his priesthood ordination in two years. Samala´s home is just a few blocks from the center, and it is always open to the seminarians to drop in for a chat, said Monsignor Panlican.

A special bond exists, he said, noting how once when Samala was hospitalized, the seminarians donated blood as well as visited her and prayed with her at her bedside.

The formation house was founded in June 1994 by Bishop Florentino Cinense of Tarlac. Comprising the civil province of Tarlac, the diocese has some 950,000 people, 85 percent of whom are Catholics.

The Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice award, instituted by Pope Leo XIII in 1888, is given to people for services to the Church and the papacy. Former president Corazon Aquino was among those at the June 20 ceremony for Samala.

Lugtu: Lloyd (Father Lloyd Lugtu)

$
0
0

Filipino priest with the Diocese of  Tariac,  Philippines.  Ordained 08 May 1999 .   Arrived in the Newfoundland and serving in the Diocese of Grand Falls around 2010.

June or July 2014:  Suspended by bishop and under investigation by RCMP. The allegations are allegedly those of sexual assault.  Father Lugtu was suspended around the same time as Father Richard Salas, also from the Philippines, and also being investigated by the RCMP.

Canon lawyer.  Serving on diocesan marriage tribunal

_______________________________

Bishops of the Diocese of Grand Falls Newfoundland since Father Lugtus arrival: Martin William Currie (12 December 2000  – 01 March 2011 Resigned to become Archbishop of Saint John’s NL full time );  Robert Anthony Daniels (1 March 2011  – )

__________________

The following information is drawn from Canadian Catholic Church Directories (CCCD) which I have on hand and information online as identified

10 July 2014Fathers Richard Salas & Lloyd Lugtu shown as priests “active”  in Gander Diocese (this list was posted 10 July 2014.  I believe this was after the two priests were suspended and under investigation)

Shown in diocesan website as Administrator of St Joseph’s & St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Church in Port Union, Newfoundland Roman Catholic Church (Father Lloyd Lugtu  10 July 2014.  I believe Father Lugtu was already under investigation and had been suspended when this was posted on the diocesan website.

2013:  Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as a  Associate Judicial Vicar  (CCCD)

2012:  Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as Defender of the Bond (CCCD)

- greetings on Radio Mari Philippines on occasion of anniversary of his ordination (Father Lugtu Radio Maria Philippines)

2011: Pastor or administrator (?) ?  St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity (CCCD)

- serving on the diocesan marriage tribunal as a Judge (CCCD)

July 2010:  Is in  Newfoundland and seems to have been assisting at the Immaculate Conception Cathedral, Grand Falls Diocese (Father Lugtu in Newfoundland July 2010)

2010:  Not listed in index (CCCD)

date ?:  at some point prior to departure for Newfoundland served as parish priest in Tarlac (LFather Lloyd Lugtu pastor in Philippines)

Maria Divina Pastora Parish (F-2006)
Address: Balutu, Concepcion 2316 Tarlac, Philippines
Titular: Maria Divina Pastora,

Parish Priest:  Father Lloyd Lugtu
Parish Priest: Father Lloyd Lugtu

Undated:  Listed as “Advocate” with the diocesan marriage tribunal in Diocese of Tarlac

08 May 1999:  ORDAINED

studied theology at the Pontifical University of Santo Tomas (external link to page)

lived at the Our Lady of Peace Formation House while pursuing studies for ordination for the Diocese of Tarlac in the Philippines

________________________________

 PARISHIONERS GIVE SEMINARIANS FINANCIAL SUPPORT, MOTHERLY CARE

UCANews.com

Philippines

July 29 1998

Laypeople in a Quezon City parish offer both financial help and motherly care to 13 financially pressed seminarians from the northern Philippines doing their theology studies in Manila.

Remedios Samala, a leading sponsor at Hearts of Jesus and Mary Parish, recently received the Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice papal award especially for her help to the seminarians of Tarlac diocese, 110 kilometers northwest of Manila.

Samala donated 50,000 pesos (US$1,200) to Our Lady of Peace Formation House, where the seminarians live, from sponsors of her award investiture alone, said Monsignor Orlando Panlican, rector at the center.

“Aside from this, the formation house has received more or less 139,000 pesos in addition to our monthly supply of eggs, longaniza (native sausage) and other food supplies,” he added.

While the widow, a native of Tarlac province, has been a liaison between the center and prospective benefactors, “her greatest help for the formation house is her motherly concern for our needs,” said Monsignor Panlican.

“She is very active in the life of the foundation house, visiting us often,” said Lloyd Lugtu, at 24 the oldest seminarian at the center.

The second of four children of a teacher and her engineer husband, Lugtu recalled how “very happy” his parents were when he decided to enter the seminary, but they could not pay for his studies without help.

Lugtu, who studied theology at the Pontifical University of Santo Tomas (UST), has lived at the formation house for five years. He awaits his priestly ordination next year.

Another seminarian at the center, Peter de la Cruz, recalls how the seminarians once stayed at Samala´s house “when the electricity at the formation house was cut off because we weren´t able to pay our bill.”

The third of four children of a retired electrician and his unemployed wife, de la Cruz, 23, is also studying theology at UST as he anticipates his priesthood ordination in two years. Samala´s home is just a few blocks from the center, and it is always open to the seminarians to drop in for a chat, said Monsignor Panlican.

A special bond exists, he said, noting how once when Samala was hospitalized, the seminarians donated blood as well as visited her and prayed with her at her bedside.

The formation house was founded in June 1994 by Bishop Florentino Cinense of Tarlac. Comprising the civil province of Tarlac, the diocese has some 950,000 people, 85 percent of whom are Catholics.

The Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice award, instituted by Pope Leo XIII in 1888, is given to people for services to the Church and the papacy. Former president Corazon Aquino was among those at the June 20 ceremony for Samala.

Priest breaches bail while appealing conviction

$
0
0

It’s been a crazy busy few days, both from the perspective of information on or related to Sylvia’s Site, and the  hustle and bustle which arises sometimes in day to day life.

There are a few things of whixch I want to make note.  My plan was to do it all together but for the sake of expediency I think best I pass on those I can blog on right now, and then blog later to cover others.

Here goes:

(1)  Father Rene Labelle

You may recall that Father labelle was found guilty on three sex-related charges in April of this year and was sentenced to 16 months in jail.  You may also recall that he interned to appeal,  either the conviction or the sentence or both.

Well. here is the latest news:

(a) Father Labelle is facing two new charges for breaching his parole conditions.  My understanding is that the charges arose from his failure to report to police as required.  Labelle has already had at least one courtdate in relation to these charges.  His next courtdate on these charges is:

28 August 2014:  09:00 am, “to be spoken to,” Kingston Ontario Courthouse, 279 Wellington St. Kingston

(b)  The appeal has not, as they say “been perfected” yet.  That means that the required documents have not yet been filed in order to proceed.

It seems to be taking an unduly  long time indeed to get on with this.  Mind you, I had heard that it usually takes at least a year for an appeal to be heard.  There are however timelines which must be met for filing all the requisite paperwork.

Anyway, that’s where the appeal stands.  All the paperwork has yet to be filed

Please keep the victim and his family in your prayers.  This is difficult for all of them.

The guilty verdict and sentencing is in abeyance until the appeal business is sorted out, so of course Father Labelle is out and about, on bail,  but possibly not, according to the new charges, biding by his bail conditions.

****

A new Statement of Claim related to sex abuse allegations re deceased ex priest and convicted molester Charles Sylvestre has been posted:

Jane Doe No. 28 and the estate of Charles H. Sylvestre, the Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of London in Ontario et al

This case is going to trial 28 September 2014 in London, Ontario.

Please keep Jane Doe Bo. 28 in your  prayers.

*****

There’s an excellent new documentary out in Australia:  In the Name of the Law.  I confess I have not yet watched beyond the John Ellis segment but fully intend to do so.  I confess too that I stopped watching  because I was overwhelmed by the pain I see in John Ellis’ – a lawyer – eyes.  I don’t think I have ever seen so much pain in the eyes of one person.

This is a not so gentle reminder of the anguish caused by these predators in the Church, and  by those who cover-up for them, and by many if not most of those who represent the dioceses in dealing with the victims, and by so many lawyers and Church officials who deal with and  the victims and those who spin the truth.

John Ellis has been on my mind for hours end.  My thoughts and prayers are with him.

*****

Supper calls.

I will wrap up later with info on the Two filipino priests suspended in Newfoundland

Enough for now,

Sylvia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2)  Video ABS Four Corners

 

“Quebec Catholic order agrees to $20M abuse settlement”& related articles

$
0
0
Quebec Catholic order agrees to $20M abuse settlement

Frank Tremblay, one of the victims who spearheaded the lawsuit.

Credits: ANNIE T ROUSSEL/QMI AGENCY

QMI AGENCY

QUEBEC CITY – A Catholic order has agreed to pay $20 million to at least 100 former students molested by priests between 1960 and 1987.

Nine priests were accused of abusing children at Saint-Alphonse college east of Quebec City. Some of the priests have since died.

The college is associated with the internationally revered shrine at the Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre Basilica, located northeast of the city.

A lawyer for the Redemptorist order at the centre of the scandal confirmed the cash settlement Tuesday.

Last month the Catholic group lost a class action lawsuit filed by former students.

Instead of appealing the verdict, both sides spent the past week negotiating the settlement, which a judge must approve within 30 days.

“It was difficult,” said victim Frank Tremblay, who spearheaded the suit after he said a priest molested him 80 times as a child.

“But I’m glad. What’s happened here is a big deal.”

Tremblay will get $150,000 while other victims could claim at least $75,000 each.

The settlement follows a hearing last fall in Quebec City, where more than a dozen former students testified against the priests.

One of the priests named in the lawsuit, Raymond-Marie Lavoie, is in prison after pleading guilty in 2011 to sexually abusing 13 boys at the college, including Tremblay.

Lavoie entered the plea just as his trial was set to begin.

He said he committed the acts when he was a teacher, supervisor and dormitory custodian.

___________________________

Redemptorist Order of Catholic Priests to pay sexual abuse victims $20M

Landmark out-of-court settlement highest in Quebec’s history for sexual abuse lawsuit

CBC News

Posted: Aug 12, 2014 1:31 PM ET      Last Updated: Aug 12, 2014 7:17 PM ET


The Redemptorist Order of Catholic Priests will pay $20 million to victims of sexual abuse at its St-Alphonse Seminary near Quebec City during the 1970s and ’80s.

Robert Kugler, the lawyer representing former students at the seminary, said the landmark out-of-court settlement is the largest ever paid in a class-action sexual abuse lawsuit in Quebec.

In July, Superior Court Judge Claude Bouchard ordered the Redemptorist Order, the St-Alphonse Seminary and Rev. Raymond-Marie Lavoie to pay at least $75,000 to each of the lawsuit’s 70 claimants.

The main claimant, Frank Tremblay, has spoken publicly about the abuse he suffered as a student at Séminaire Saint-Alphonse.

“I talked with a lot of the men yesterday and this morning. Some are happy, some are anxious, and some don’t know what will happen,” Tremblay told CBC’s Breakaway.

Tremblay launched the class-action lawsuit in 2010 against a former teacher at the seminary.

“It was the first time I came back to that period of my life. It put me in a nightmare. It was really difficult,” said Tremblay.

Tremblay said one of the most important aspects of his victory is that other claimants will not have to fight statutes of limitations, even though some of the abuses took place more than 30 years ago.

“The statutes of limitations are over for the Redemptorists, so it is a great, great victory for me,” said Tremblay.

“I won for all those men and I’m really proud of that,” he said.

Other victims have since come forward, bringing the number of total claimants to more than 100 — and counting.

“That number is likely to go up by a lot… We have tried to simplify the process to ensure that a maximum number of victims present claims,” Kugler told Radio-Canada.

Lawyers representing the men who attended the private boarding school in Saint-Anne-de-Beaupré as teenagers alleged there was systemic abuse and a cover-up at the school during the ’70s and ’80s.

Serge Létourneau, a lawyer in the case, said two of the alleged abusers were once principals at the school and also sat on the provincial executive committee of the Redemptorist Order.

In 2011, Lavoie pleaded guilty to sexually abusing 13 children and is serving a five-year sentence.

______________________________________

Religious order to pay record sexual abuse settlement

The Redemptorist religious order is probably best known in Canada for its association with the Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré shrine near Quebec City, a major tourist attraction and holy pilgrimage site for devout Catholics. Now the congregation is in the spotlight for a dark chapter in its past.

The Catholic community has agreed to pay $20-million to people who were once schoolboys in its care in what is described as a record sexual-abuse settlement in Quebec.

In a deal announced on Tuesday, the order approved settling a class-action lawsuit brought on behalf of abuse victims at the school during a 27-year span beginning in 1960. The students, all boys, were aged 12 to 16 at the time.

“This is a landmark case,” said Robert Kugler, a Montreal lawyer who represents the victims. “This is the highest amount that has ever been paid by a religious congregation in Quebec to settle a class action dealing with sexual abuse.”

The suit was launched by former student Frank Tremblay against the school, the Redemptorist order, and priest Raymond-Marie Lavoie. Mr. Tremblay recounted that as a 13-year-old student, he sought out Mr. Lavoie after feeling anxious and unable to sleep one night; he ended up being assaulted three to five times a week for four months. (Mr. Lavoie, in a criminal trial, pleaded guilty in 2011 to sexually assaulting 13 boys at the school – the Séminaire Saint-Alphonse, subsequently named Collège Saint-Alphonse – while he was a dorm supervisor.)

Quebec Superior Court held the religious order responsible in a ruling in July. The court decision recounts a harrowing catalogue of abuse carried out by the Redemptorist priests against young boys entrusted to their care, from sexual touching to sodomy.

The private school was a well-regarded institution next to the basilica in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré. It drew many children from families of modest means, drawn to its reputation for high educational standards.

The abuse spread upward in the school hierarchy to include two school directors, who also turned a deaf ear to the students’ laments, according to the judge’s decision. When one complained about the predatory behaviour of two priests, the director retorted that the student should consider himself lucky to get so much attention and affection; he then reminded the boy that his mother had not paid his bill for three months.

Two other students who complained about abuse were threatened with expulsion.

The judge in the class action, Claude Bouchard, said the Redemptorist order could not have been unaware of the sexual predation by its priests.

“We are not talking about isolated acts committed by a few priests,” he said in addressing the order’s responsibility. He cited “repeated acts” by nine priests against more than 70 students during more than two decades. Six of the priests have since died.

“Whether it was in the dorm, the nearby priest’s bedroom … in his school office, infirmary, school hallway, in the refectory or in a cottage belonging to the school a few kilometres away, is it possible that sexual assaults perpetrated in these different places could have occurred without the Redemptorists being informed one way or the other?” Justice Bouchard asked.

“The court doesn’t believe it,” he concluded.

More than 70 former students have joined the class action and more are expected to come forward.

The $20-million settlement will be submitted to the court for approval within 30 days.

A lawyer for the order, Pierre Baribeau, told Radio-Canada that the congregation was “relieved” about the compensation arrangement, and its members were also relieved that the case is coming to a close.

Follow on Twitter: @iperitz

The suspensions, denials and prolonged silence

$
0
0

I promised some more info on the suspensions and investigations of two Filipino priest in the Diocese of Grand Falls, Newfoundland.

Here is some backgrounder

(1) I received word around mid-July 2014 that Fathers Richard Salas and Lloyd Lugtu had been suspended by the Bishop (Daniels) and were under investigation for sexual assault. The allegations are NOT historic.

(2) At this point in time, as far as I can ascertain and from what I hear the two priests arrived in the Grand falls Diocese sometime in 2010. That was when Archbishop William Currie was serving as both Bishop of Grand Falls and Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Saint John, Newfoundland. (It was in September 2010 that we had word Archbishop Currie had recycled convicted molester Father Michael Walsh into St. Brendan’s in Cottel Island, Bonavista Bay.  After much upset in the small community Archbishop Currie finally relented and advised that Father Walsh would no longer grace the sanctuary of St. Brendan’s.  More recently Archbishop Currie did announce the suspension of Father Dohey)

(3) A week ago parishioners at St. Joseph’s in Gander were informed that Father Salas had been suspended and is under investigation by the RCMP.

(4) And then, one full week later, this past weekend Father William Hearn, the Vicar General and Chancellor of the diocese travelled to and ‘said’ Mass at St Joseph’s & St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Church in Port Union. At that time the small congregation was finally advised that their priest, Father Lugtue had been suspended and is currently under investigation by the RCMP.

Mass at Bonavista had been cancelled. Father Hearn did not travel to relate the news to those parishioners. True enough, the two churches are only a short 15 miles or so apart and those who wished to do so may have been able to drive to Port Union, however without doubt there would have been those who could not make the trip.

(5) Father Richard Salas, ordained in 2002, hailed from the Diocese of Sorsogan in the Philippines.

(6) Father Salas is listed in the index of the 2010 Canadian Catholic Church Directory (CCCD) at Joseph Roman Catholic Church in Gander. He has been in charge of St. Joseph’s ever since. It seems he has been administrator of the parish for those years – the diocesan website shows him as such.

(7) Father Lloyd Lugtu, ordained in 1999, hailed from the Diocese of Tariac, also in the Philippines.

Although he is not listed in the index of the 2010 Canadian Catholic Church Directory I do find reference to Father Lugtu in July 2010 as the celebrant in a funeral conducted at Immaculate Conception Cathedral. It seems possible then that Father Lugtu was perhaps assisting at the Cathedral when he first arrived?

By 2011 Father Lugtu was listed as Parish Administrator at St. Joseph & St. Patrick Roman Catholic Church, Port Union. Newfoundland, with missions in Bonavista and Trinity. The rectory is situated in Port Union.

Father Lugtu is a canon lawyer. In that regard, since his arrival or shortly thereafter, Lugtu has been serving in various capacities on the Grand Falls Diocese Marriage Tribunal.

(8) As I said, in mid July of this year I received word that Father Salas and Lugtu had both been suspended and were under investigation by the RCMP. The allegations allegedly relate to sexual assault of a male.

(9) On Thursday 17 July I sent the following letter to Father William Houlahn. Father Houlahan was and is listed on the diocesan website as Vicar General and Chancellor:

Dear Father Houlahan

I am Sylvia MacEachern, the operator of Sylvia’s Site where I blog on the sex abuse scandal and betrayals of trust in the Roman Catholic Church in Canada. (http://www.theinquiry.ca/wordpress/)

I have been told that Fathers Lloyd Lugtu and Richard Salas were suspended last month and that an RCMP investigation of both priests entailing sex assault of males is currently underway.

I am seeking clarification with the following questions:

(1) Are there allegations of sexual assault or sexual impropriety of some sort against one or both priests?

(2) Have the two priests in fact been suspended?

(3) Are the two priests still in the diocese?

Thanking you in advance for your assistance Father, I remain

Yours truly

Sylvia MacEachern

One week passed. No response.

(10) On Thursday 24 July 2014 I called Father Houlahan.

Yes, he had received my email, but ““I’m not in any position to comment… I’m no longer the VG.”  Father Houlahan, it turns out, had ceased his duties as VG and Chancellor about five months ago. His replacement is Father William Hearn.

(11)   I called Father Hearn. I explained that I was seeking confirmation that both Father Richard Salas and Father Lloyd Lugtu had been suspended and were under investigation.

Father Hearn advised that it is not in his jurisdiction to confirm or deny at this point: “It’s a matter for the bishop to deal with these things. All I can do is refer you to him.”

I was told that Father Hearn would take my phone number, and he in turn would tell the bishop that I had called and give the bishop my number.

(12)  And, on Thursday 24 July I tried calling the rectory in Port Union, hoping at the least to reach a secretary, or at best Father Lugtu.

Answering machine!

But, an answering machine with a message, which in essence said that in the case of an emergency call this number.

In my mind this is an emergency. I called.

(13) Father Lugtu answered the phone.

I opened by asking if it was true that he is under investigation for a sexual assault. The immediate response was: “Who is this?”

I identified myself.

The rest of the conversation went something like this (S = Sylvia: FL = Father Lugtu):

S: I’ve heard you under invest: and you’ve been suspended

FL: Well I don’t know about that

S: Are you working right now?

FL: I’m on holidays.

FL: Where is this news coming from?

S: From people

FL: Who?

S: I don’t reveal my sources.

FL: I’m shocked actually

S: So you’re not under investing by police?
FL: No

S: And you’re not suspended?

FL: I don’t know about that.

S: You haven’t been suspended?

FL: No. I’m not suspended. I’m on holiday

FL: Who told you that? I need to know

S: Are you saying it’s a lie?

FL: I’d like to know who’s saying what

S: I heard both you and Father Salas were suspended and are under investigation?

FL: “Oh! I don’t know. I’m not aware of it

S: Do you deny you ever assaulted anyone?

FL: Ah. Do I need to answer that question, because I want to know who’s saying this?

FL: I don’t know, I’m not aware.

FL: I will talk to my superiors. I’m not aware

S: I sent email to diocese last week: I will call them as well

S: What date are you due back?
FL: August

S: What date?

FL: Ah, I don’t know yet. I don’t have a fixed date. I’m on holidays, so probably 05 August

S: When did you go on holiday Father?

FL: 05 July

S: Do you plan to go home?

FL: Home is where?

S: The Phillippines

FL: No, I’m just here.

S: In Newfoundland?

FL: No, here, in Toronto

(14)  By late afternoon the following day (25 July 2014) there was no call back from the bishop. I sent the following email to Bishop Robert Anthony Daniel:

Your Excellency,

As you are no doubt aware I have been trying for the past week to get confirmation that Fathers Lawrence Lugtu and Richard Salas have been suspended and are under investigation by the RCMP for allegations related to sexual misconduct.

In that regard I sent an email to Father William Houlahan last Thursday. (Father Houlihan is listed on the diocesan website as Vicar General and Chancellor)

Yesterday (Thursday) I contacted Father Houlahan by phone and was surprised to hear that he is no longer the Vicar General and Chancellor and has not held those positions for approximately the past five months. Father Houlihan gave me the name of his successor, Father Bill Hearn.

I contacted Father Hearn by phone yesterday. Father Hearn advised that it is not in his jurisdiction to confirm or deny these things. He took my phone number. My understanding was that he would speak to you and you in turn would phone me.

Would you please, your Excellency, confirm by phone or in writing that the two priests in question have been suspended and are currently under investigation by the RCMP.

Thanking you in advance for your assistance in this troublesome matter, I remain

Yours respectfully,

Sylvia MacEachern
Sylvia’s Site
[my phone number]

Bishop Daniels, a native of Windsor Ontario and former auxiliary bishop in the Diocese of London, Ontario, has yet to respond.

(15) On 05 August 2014 the news broke that Father Salas is suspended and under investigation, amd that after parishioners were told that Father Salas had been suspended

(16)  This past weekend Father Hearn informed parishioners at  St Joseph’s & St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Church in Port Union that Father Lugtu is suspended and under investigation.

(17) (Attempts to get confirmation of the instigation from the RCMP detachments in Bonavista and Grand Falls failed)

Enough for now,

Sylvia

Selas: Frank Selas

$
0
0
Selas Frank Selas

1971

Frank Selas

“Mr. Wonder”

fugitive from justice

Layman teacher at St. Mary’s International School in Tokyo in the early 70s.  While at SMIS taught Grade 4 boys..

Greatly admired by some of the boys because he drove one of the first Nissan Zs

Took over as leader of the Boy Scouts at SMIS in 1970.  I have been told that he took the boys to the swimming pool and told them all to jump in.  The boys didn’t have their bathing suits so had to jump in in their undies. Once the cotton undies were wet of course it became clinging and see-through.

1970:  Teaching at SMIS during Expo 70 in Osaka.  Selas  took about SMIS six boys with him to Osaka.  When the boys returned they were, I was told,  “bug-eyed” – telling the other boys that Selas had then taking about six showers a day – together! -  and that he, Selas, kissed one of the boys on the cheek.

July 1971 :  ‘Junior Peace Corps’ adventure for 34 0r 40?

Selas and two or three other men took a group of boys from various international schools in Japan on a 28-day “‘Junior Peace Corp’  adventure” to India and Southeast Asia.  Please take the time to read the writeup on this trip below (click on each page of the article to enlarge for reading)  Note the latter part of the highlighted para on the second page advising of Selas credentials which include “living and working with youngsters in no less than 31 countries as part of his studies in Child Psychology.”

Click on the pictures to enlarge and read.

Selas world trip with students 1971 newspaper article_Redacted_Page_1

Selas world trip with students 1971 newspaper article_Redacted_Page_2

It is believed but has not been confirmed that Frank Selas was kicked out of SMIS for his behavior around the boys.  Some years later an SMIS grad mentioned to one of the brothers that he, the former student, had had concerns about Selas – the brother allegedly replied that he knew about Selas and that Selas had been fired. (The scout leader who replaced Selas was Brother Alban Cyr)

05 September 1974:  Principal of St. Anthony Catholic Indian Mission School, Zuni, New Mexico.  Running the following ad for teacher’s aids in New Mexico newspaper:

The Gallup Independent
05 September 1974

Page 14

http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/35505580/

ST. ANTHONY SCHOOL ZUNI has opening for TEACHER AIDS. No special educational requirement. No experience necessary. Apply in person.  Ask for Frank Selas, principal

approx. 1978-1979:  Selas is now “Mr. Wonder” – emcee/host of Mr. Wonder’s Children’s Show in  Monroe, Louisiana.

April 1979:  Announced on air during his show that there would be a camping trip for boys age 5 to 15 in May.

May 1979:  Molested six boys during the camping trip in Louisiana.  Fled town when police came to question him.  His car was found at the Monroe airport.  It is believed he fled the country.

06 June 1979:  Warrants out for his arrest:

The Salina Journal

06 June 1979

MONROE, La, (UPI) – “Mr. Wonder,” the host of a children’s television show, was sought Wednesday by Louisiana authorities on two warrants for his arrest in the molesting of at least six young boys. Frank Selas — 40, emcee of “Mr. Wonder’s Childrens Show,” aired on Saturday afternoons on KNOE-TV in Monroe — is wanted on charges of misbehavior with juveniles, the Ouachita Parish Sheriff’s Department said Tuesday. He is accused of molesting at least six young boys during a summer camp he sponsored last weekend for boys from 5 to 15 years old, deputies said. One of the victims was hospitalized, they said

2003Comments on blogsite re Mr. Wonder and abuse of boys

2014Where is Mr. Wonder?


Chilling

$
0
0

I have added the page for Frank Selas, a former teacher at St. Mary’s International School in Japan. Selas was NOT a member of the Brothers of Christian Instruction, but would have been hired by them to teach at the school.

I promised this page some time ago but was having difficulty confirming a report I received advising that Selas had fled the country after being reported in Louisiana.  I had hunted and hunted in vain.  Then two days ago I went hunting again, and, there it was :)

I believe the information on the page speaks for itself.

Be sure to read those two pages from the Tokyo Weekender.  You just have to click on the image and it will enlarge – then use the magnifier to bring it to size for comfortable reading.

I can find no record of Selas’ death.  It’s highly probably he is still alive and hiding out in South America.  A fugitive.

Is he around children?  Probably.  Does he have access to children?  Probably.

Chilling.

If anyone has any more recent pictures of Frank Selas please send.  I am awaiting some information on the nature of this “Mr. Wonder: children’s show – ‘wondering’ of course, as I am sure are you, why he was called Mr. Wonder?

Enough for now,

Sylvia

Brothers of Christian Instruction (Mennasians)

$
0
0

The Brothers of Christian Instruction is a religious order of Brothers founded by Jean-Marie de la Mennais and Gabriel Deshayes.  The brothers are also known as La Mennais Brothers or Mennasians.

St. Mary’s International School (SMIS)

St Mary’s International School, founded by the Christian Brothers of Instruction in 1954, is an all boys school in Tokyo Japan.   The Brothers are also known as the Mennasian Brothers.  The school was operated and staffed by the Japan district of the Brothers in Canada.  According to its website, St. Mary’s now has close to 1,000 boys from approximately 60 different countries attending classes ranging from Kindergarten (“pre-first grade” ) to high school (four-year college preparatory curriculum.  The Canadian Brothers now form the Province Jean de La Mennais.  Japan and the Philippines  is a Vice Province  – part of the Canadian Province.

There are now allegations that five brothers sexually abused boys at SMIS:

(1) Brother Lawrence Lambert fic(Guy Lambert);

(2) Brother John Paradis fic(Brother Paul-Emile Paradis or Brother Paul Paradis);

(3) Brother Benoit Lessard fic (Brother Daniel Lessard).  Brother Lessard died in 1980;

(4)   Brother Marcel Villemure fic (Brother Claude Villemure) and

(5)  Brother Alban Cyr fic

There are allegations related to one layman who taught at St. Mary’s International Schoo

(1)   Frank Selas

____________________________________

15 August 2014:  BLOG  “Chilling”

________________________

Simon Scott says:

Hi! My name is Simon Scott and I am a Tokyo-based freelance journalist who is a regular contributor to the Japan Times. I am also the Japan correspondent for the New Zealand Herald. Many of the stories I have published are up on the web, so Google: Simon Scott + Japan Time etc., if you want to check out previous stuff I have written.

I am currently researching a story about sexual abuse at St. Mary’s International School for the Japan Times and want to communicate with anyone who has any relevant information. I would like to talk with not just the victims of the abuse, but also anyone who may have information they feel could help with my story or who may be able to put me in contact with someone who does. I fully understand this is a sensitive topic and be rest assured that I won’t disclose the identity of any sources who wish to remain anonymous.

Please email me at my personal email address: rotty007@gmail.com

Regards,
Simon Scott.

Child sex abuse royal commission: Child abuse claims in Victoria cost Catholic Church $34m, inquiry hears

$
0
0

ABC News (American Broadcasting Company)

Updated

Photo: Demonstrators gathered outside the County Court on the first day of the child abuse royal commission in Melbourne. (ABC News: James Fettes)

Child abuse claims in Victoria since 1996 have cost the Catholic Church more than $34 million, an inquiry has heard.

The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is investigating the church’s so-called Melbourne response to allegations of child sexual abuse by its clergy.

The scheme was introduced by Cardinal Pell when he was Melbourne’s archbishop in 1996, and was a first of its kind.

It allowed anyone allegedly abused by priests or others under the authority of the archbishop to have what the church called “an independent commissioner” to investigate their claims and make findings.

Compensation from the scheme was originally capped at $50,000 before being lifted to $75,000, with the cap a subject of contention among victims and their advocates.

Counsel assisting the commission Gail Furness SC said data from the Archdiocese of Melbourne showed abuse claims had cost the church more than $34 million.

“The total of ex gratia payments made under the Melbourne response for child sexual abuse claims and amounts paid for medical counselling and treatment amounted to $17.295 million,” Ms Furness said.

“The cost of administering the Melbourne response was $17.011 million.”

She told the commission victims had received larger payments by going outside of Melbourne response scheme.

“The average compensation payment amount paid is $36,100,” she said.

“(A total of) $3,187 for those claims settled within the response, $168,000 for those that began within the Melbourne response but settled outside, and just short of $300,000 for those outside the Melbourne response.

“Since the cap increased to $75,000, the total amount of compensation paid to 65 victims of child sexual abuse has been $3.3 million, the average compensation payment being just over $50,000.”

Ms Furness told the inquiry that ex gratia payments made under the Melbourne response scheme did not constitute an admission of liability.

“In announcing the Melbourne response, it was stated that the establishment of the compensation panel and the offer of ex gratia compensation payments were not an admission of liability,” she said.

The archbishop, the archdiocese and the church, in the document recording the Melbourne response, did not accept that they had any legal obligation to make payments to complainants.”

The hearings were interrupted after lunch by a power outage in the area.

Couple whose daughter died pulled out of ‘Melbourne response’

Christine Foster, the mother of victims of Catholic Church abuse, was the first witness to take the stand this morning.

Two of Christine and Anthony Foster’s three daughters were assaulted by a Catholic priest while in primary school. One subsequently committed suicide.

Ms Furness said Mrs Foster would give evidence that “Emma and Katie were abused by their parish priest, Father Kevin O’Donnell, when they were students at Sacred Heart primary school” and that the abuse continued in their early years at primary school and beyond.

“Neither Mrs Foster nor Anthony were aware of the abuse at the time it occurred,” she said.

Mrs Foster then gave harrowing details of the impact of O’Donnell’s sexual abuse of her two daughters.

She said Emma, who suffered from anorexia, and had at least 900 doctor, specialist and pathology visits, at least 75 outpatient psychology appointments, and more than 50 admissions to hospital, detox and rehabilitation clinics, before taking her own life in 2008.

Katie took to binge drinking to escape the memories of her abuse.

Mrs Foster said she was hit by a car after binge drinking in 1999 and now required 24-hour care.

Mrs Foster told the commission that church leaders appeared “stand-offish” and did not appear to want to listen to concerned parents at a meeting.

Nothing about this process was transparent.

Christine Foster

She said the family initially participated in the Melbourne response scheme.

“Nothing about this process was transparent,” Ms Foster said.

They received an offer of $50,000 for Emma, which was then the maximum, which Emma accepted, although she did not sign the trust deed.

“We told Emma not to accept the offer as we knew this would end all her rights,” Mrs Foster said.

The Fosters later decided to pursue legal action against the Catholic Church, instead of continuing through the Melbourne response scheme.

Mrs Foster said she was shocked to discover the defendants did not admit that Emma and Katie had been sexually abused.

They eventually reached an out-of-court settlement, of $750,000 plus costs, believed to be the largest compensation payout of its kind in Australia.

Six months after Emma’s death, the Fosters were accused of “dwelling crankily on old wounds”.

Mrs Foster told the commission she believed they settled for an amount of money that was far less than what their children were entitled to.

She and her husband wanted the cap on payments removed and all past claims reviewed.

One priest the subject of 19pc of compensation claims

The commission heard O’Donnell’s actions accounted for almost a fifth (19 per cent) of all compensation paid by the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne.

The archdiocese paid people who were abused by O’Donnell $1,886,100 through the Melbourne response scheme, up to March this year, the commission was told.

Other complaints about O’Donnell, who was a parish priest in Oakleigh, have been settled outside the scheme.

The total amount of compensation and counselling costs paid in relation to O’Donnell is $2,934,390.

The two institutions subject to the largest number of complaints are the Sacred Heart Primary School and the Sacred Heart Parish in Oakleigh.

Church asked me to sign away rights: witness

The commission also heard that Melbourne priest, Father Victor Rubeo, targetted two generations of one family.

Paul Hersbach gave evidence about the behaviour of Rubeo, who lived at times with him and his family.

He told the commission that the abuse started when he was about seven years old, when Rubeo would come into his bedroom and sit on the bed, or would watch him and his brother when they were naked in the bath.

He told the commission that Rubeo would shower him and his brother with gifts, including computers, a CD player and a go-kart.

The Catholic Church has taken so much from me, it had complete and utter control of my life.

Paul Hersbach

Mr Hersbach testified that Rubeo had his own room at the Hersbach home at one stage and was involved in every aspect of the family’s lives – he opened the mail, paid the bills and bought groceries

“I thought it was normal,” he told the court.

Mr Hersbach testified that his father, Tony Hersbach, was abused decades earlier when he was an altar boy.

After his father made a complaint about his own abuse, Mr Hersbach said, Rubeo asked him to repay the $10,000 he given the family for the house.

In 1996 Rubeo pleaded guilty to indecently assaulting Mr Hersbach’s father and uncle.

Fresh charges were laid in 2010, but Rubeo died on the day he was due in court for his committal in 2011.

Paul Hersbach met with Peter O’Callaghan QC, a commissioner under the Melbourne response scheme, after disclosing his own abuse in 2006.

He said Mr O’Callaghan told him he could go to the police if he wanted, but based on what Mr Hersbach had told him, he did not think anything would happen.

Mr Hersbach did not approach the police.

He later received a compensation offer of $17,500.

“The Catholic Church has taken so much from me,” Mr Hersbach said.

“It had complete and utter control of my life.”

He said the irony was that just as he took action against the church, but was then asked to sign away his rights to take further action against them as part of the deed of settlement in which he received $17,500 in compensation.

‘Melbourne response’ upheld 326 complaints since 1996

Ms Furness said Melbourne Archdiocese data revealed that 351 complaints had been made under the Melbourne response scheme since it began in 1996.

“Of these complaints, 326 were upheld by an independent commissioner, nine were not upheld and 16 are currently defined as being undetermined,” she said.

“The undetermined claims are either dormant, ongoing, the complainant is deceased, or the complainant is described as considering civil proceedings.”

Of the 326 upheld complaints, the data showed 80 per cent occurred between 1950 and 1980 inclusive, 14 per cent occurred between 1981 and 1990, and 2 per cent related to alleged incidents between 1991 and 2006, Ms Furness said.

The remaining 4 per cent related to incidents between 1937 and 1949, she said.

She said 77 individuals had been named as the subject of one or more of the upheld complaints.

“Of these, just over half, 42, are known by the archbishop to be dead,” she said.

She said 84 per cent of complaints heard by the Melbourne response scheme were about priests.

“O’Callaghan QC tells Royal Commission he doesn’t report priest abuse claims to police”& related articles

$
0
0

ABC News (Australia)

Updated 19 Aug 2014, 7:16pmTue 19 Aug 2014, 7:16pm

The QC who investigates abuse complaints against priests for the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne has told the child sex abuse Royal Commission he has never reported allegations to police unless he has been helping a victim do so. Peter O’Callaghan told the commission he is completely independent of the church and has always treated complainants fairly and courteously.

Samantha Donovan

___________________________

Child sex abuse royal commission: Melbourne Response investigator ‘encouraged’ victims to see police

ABS News Austrlalia

Updated 19 Aug 2014, 4:42pmTue 19 Aug 2014, 4:42pm

By Helen Vines

The head of the Catholic Church’s response to sexual abuse allegations encouraged victims to go to the police, the child abuse royal commission has heard.

Peter O’Callaghan, QC, has been the independent commissioner for the abuse complaint handling process, known as the Melbourne Response, since it was set up in 1996 by then Melbourne Archbishop George Pell.

Mr O’Callaghan has come in for criticism during the current proceedings, with two witnesses telling the commission he discouraged them from taking their claims to the police.

Giving evidence to the commission, Mr O’Callaghan said he encouraged victims to go to the police, and some followed his advice, while others did not.

He agreed with counsel assisting Gail Furness SC that if police were investigating a complaint, his own investigation stopped because “it would be a concurrent investigation and quite inappropriate”.
Church response offered ‘rapid redress’ for abuse victims

Mr O’Callaghan said he established a procedure for dealing with claims of abuse that involved inviting the person making the claim to visit him.

He told the hearing how he would then take a statement and submit it to the victim for approval or amendments.

If the priest involved was still alive he would refer it to him and invite a response.

He said he felt the church’s response to complainants was “very rapid redress” and they aimed to resolve matters in six months.

The commission heard Mr O’Callaghan made adverse findings against 65 priests out of 330 complaints to the Melbourne Response.

Twenty of the adverse findings were against priests who were still active.

Mr O’Callaghan said some priests who had been the subject of adverse findings had never been prosecuted by police and many of those were on administrative leave and not allowed to practice.

He said there was a 97 per cent success rate with complainants who came to him.

He told the commission he was a truly independent investigator when it came to investigate claims of abuse.

“As far as I’m concerned I made decision without fear or favour or influence from other persons,” he said.
Foster daughter a victim of ‘grievous’ abuse

The commission spent some time discussing the case of the Foster family, whose two daughters were abused by priests.

Mr O’Callaghan said he first met the Fosters in March 1997 and later formally found their daughter Emma had been a victim of “grievous” abuse.

He recommended an ex gratia payment of $50,000 from the church.

However, he said in his view, while her parents were badly affected by what happened, they were not victims themselves.

Later Mr O’Callaghan received an application regarding the Foster’s other daughter, Katie, who was also abused.

He said he understood the Fosters were angry with him for not providing a formal finding about Katie’s claims, even though he had formed the view years earlier that she had been abused.

Mr O’Callaghan said he was not concerned that the Fosters might take legal action, saying if he had known, he would have taken no further action.

He said he would not have provided a finding if they were taking other proceedings outside of the church’s Melbourne Response.
Melbourne Response upholds 81 complaints

The commission has been told complaints have been upheld against 81 members of the Catholic Church in Melbourne since 1996.

Mr O’Callaghan said 64 priests, five sisters and 10 lay people were among those to have been investigated by the Melbourne Response program.

More than 350 cases were taken to Melbourne Response and 326 were upheld.

_______________________________________

Catholic priests encouraged victims of abuse to go the police, the church tells the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

Melbourne Herald Sun

August 19, 2014 4:52PM

Shannon Deery
Herald Sun

The Catholic Church encouraged abuse victims to go to the police, the Royal Commission in

The Catholic Church said its priests encouraged abuse victims to go to the police, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has heard. Picture: Jeremy Piper

VICTIMS of sexual abuse by Catholic priests were repeatedly encouraged to make formal complaints to police, but rarely did, the child abuse royal commission has heard.

Melbourne Response independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan QC told the commission today many victims didn’t want to name offenders to police.

Mr O’Callaghan told the hearing he didn’t pass matters to police because victims didn’t ask him to and he didn’t want to breach their confidentiality.

Just 119 of the 326 upheld complaints have been dealt with by police since the Melbourne Response, the church’s internal compensation panel, was started in 1996.

Mr O’Callaghan is being grilled as part of the commission’s examination of the Melbourne Response scheme.

It has been widely slammed by victims and was last year heavily criticised during Victoria’s parliamentary inquiry into abuse by religious and other organisations.

Victims told the royal commission they felt betrayed by the church’s Melbourne Response process, which they said lacked compassion, and called for the $75,000 cap on compensation payments to be scrapped.

A victim of paedophile priest Father Michael Glennon said Melbourne Response independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan told him the prospects of Glennon doing any more jail time were low and he might not be charged.

“I felt Mr O’Callaghan was trying to discourage me from going to the police,” the man told the commission on Monday.

The man said he felt like he couldn’t win a court case against the church so he took a $50,000 payout, with no explanation for why the compensation was $25,000 less than the maximum.

“I did not think I had any other options for seeking compensation,” he said.

The commission heard today the church vowed, in a draft terms of reference, to actively encourage victims to report complaints to police.

“Immediately upon a complaint of sexual abuse being made to him the commissioner shall inform the complainant that he or she has an unfettered and continuing right to report the matter to police”.

Mr O’Callaghan said he believed every one of his recommendations were acted upon by church hierarchy.

But he said if he found no prima facie evidence after investigating allegations no further action would be taken.

The hearing continues.

shannon.deery@news.com.au

_________________________________________

Church lawyer told victims that police involvement would postpone process

Lawyer investigating sex abuse claims on behalf of Melbourne Catholic archdiocese tells royal commission that he was required to end his involvement or risk contempt

The Guardian

theguardian.com,

Tuesday 19 August 2014 08.37 BST

Melissa Davey

Peter O’Callaghan QC leaving the royal commission in Melbourne on Tuesday. Peter O’Callaghan QC leaving the royal commission in Melbourne on Tuesday. Photograph: Julian Smith/AAP

The lawyer in charge of investigating child sex abuse claims on behalf of the Catholic archdiocese in Melbourne told victims that if they went to the police, his investigation process would end.

Peter O’Callaghan QC told the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse on Tuesday that he believed once police became involved, he would be in contempt of court if he continued the church investigation.

The two-week hearing in Melbourne is scrutinising church’s scheme for handling abuse cases, known as the Melbourne Response, established by Cardinal George Pell in 1996.

A witness identified only as AFA told the commission on Monday that during his meeting with O’Callaghan, he was told he would be eligible for compensation from the church of up to $75,000, but this process would be postponed if he went to police.

O’Callaghan said this was standard procedure.

“…if the police are in charge of a matter then I take no further steps because to do so would be conducting a concurrent investigation with the police which would be inappropriate,” he told the Commission.

“In some instances, quite a number, if the person was receiving counselling that would continue.”

O’Callaghan’s responsibilities in terms of encouraging victims to report complaints to the police as part of his role were clear, senior counsel assisting, Gail Furness, said.

He was to inform the victim of his or her unfettered right to report the matter to police immediately upon receiving their complaint, and appropriately encourage victims to exercise that right.

On Monday the court heard from sex abuse victim Paul Hersbach, who said after being interviewed by O’Callaghan he was told there did not seem to be much point in going to the police and that if he did, his case for compensation would be delayed.

But in his witness statement, O’Callaghan said he had no recollection of that conversation, which he would have likely taped.

O’Callaghan told the commission in his 18 years as independent investigator, he had found 97% of alleged abusers guilty.

More than 70 church staff including priests, and 10 lay people involved with the church, had been found guilty of abuse as a result of his investigations, he said.

The hearing resumes Wednesday.

___________________________________________

 Barrister picked by George Pell to investigate sex abuse gives evidence

Peter O’Callaghan QC questioned by royal commission about Catholic church’s Melbourne Response and the level of compensation to victims

The Guardian

theguardian.com

Tuesday 19 August 2014 05.43 BST

Melissa Davey

Peter O’Callaghan QC leaving the royal commission in Melbourne on Tuesday. Peter O’Callaghan QC leaving the royal commission in Melbourne on Tuesday. Photograph: Julian Smith/AAP

The barrister appointed by Cardinal George Pell in 1996 to investigate hundreds of child sexual abuse claims involving the Catholic church in Melbourne thought all claims would be investigated within six months, the royal commission has heard.

More than 18 years later, Peter O’Callaghan QC is still working on the investigation as victims continue to come forward.

His role in Melbourne Response – the operation set up by the church to investigate the claims – included interviewing victims in his legal chambers in the city and making recommendations to the church as to whether they should be compensated, the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse heard on Tuesday.

On Monday, two witnesses told the hearing at Victoria county court in Melbourne how they felt discouraged by O’Callaghan from reporting their abuse to the authorities. They also spoke of feeling overwhelmed by O’Callaghan’s chambers, where most interviews were, and still are, carried out.

Abuse victim Paul Hersbach told the court on Monday that the chambers were “monstrous”.

“It was a massive room – monstrous – it seemed to me to be the domain of an experienced legal professional,” he said.

“Mr O’Callaghan looked very comfortable, but I was not. I attended this meeting alone.”

Head of the commission, Justice Peter McClellan, described how commissioners interviewing sex abuse victims tried to ensure interviews were carried out in a comfortable and supportive environment.

McClellan asked O’Callaghan: “Did you give consideration as to whether chambers was best place to meet with victims?”

O’Callaghan replied that interviews had initially been carried out at a separate office in Collins Street for 2-3 years but “it was becoming too cumbersome and it was more convenient to meet in my chambers”.

Responding to the discomfort of victims, O’Callaghan said: “Well I’ve heard that said and undoubtedly, some people were distressed,” O’Callaghan said. “But I feel that my secretary… generally she would meet with the victim and generally give a cup of tea and things of that nature.”

“In my chambers there’s naturally a desk, plenty of chairs and a large table,” he said. “If I felt my chambers were not amenable to providing assistance and comfort to people, I would have done something about it.”

Victims were not told they could bring a support person or lawyer to the meetings, but were permitted to do so if they asked, he added.

McClellan also asked if O’Callaghan had made an adverse finding against any priests who had not been prosecuted under criminal law.

“Yes,” O’Callaghan said.

“How many?” McClellan said.

“Not many,” O’Callaghan said, adding that he would have to come back to the court with the exact number.

O’Callaghan said that as an independent arbiter he had made decisions about sex abuse cases “without fear or favour and without any influence of other persons”.

He said it was not appropriate for him to say whether the compensation provided to victims by the church, currently capped at $75,000, was appropriate, despite McClellan pressing him to do so as someone who had been interviewing victims for more than 20 years.

The hearing continues.

____________________________________

Victims want review into Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response compensation claims

The Victoria Age

18 August 2014

Victims have called for all 351 compensation claims to the Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response to be reviewed and have accused the process as lacking compassion and transparency on the opening day of the Royal Commission.

Paul Hersbach told the Commission on Monday that his father, uncle, brother and himself had been abused by Father Victor Rubeo, who the family had referred to as ‘Gramps’ which had been embroidered on his hat.

“I do not need or want a personal apology. I do not want the church burned down,” he said. “All I want is for someone from the Catholic Church to show compassion and give me a call one day and say ‘Hi Paul how are you going these days?..Can I do anything to help?’”

When Mr Hersbach sought compensation from the church, he said that he was discouraged by independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan, QC, from reporting his abuse to police because he “didn’t think anything would happen”. Six weeks later he received a letter from Mr O’Callaghan saying “with respect to the unsurprising haziness of your memory there would not appear to be much point in your taking the matter to the Police”.

Mr O’Callaghan is expected to tell the Royal Commission that he does not recall the conversation.

Mr Hersbach received counselling from the Melbourne Response’s counselling arm Carelink as a “secondary victim” to his father’s abuse but only revealed he too was abused by Father Rubeo in 2006.

But he always felt intimidated and fearful that the counselling services would ultimately be withdrawn, and told the church he too had been abused in order to access counselling for himself and his wife after they experienced marital difficulties.

He later received $17,500 in compensation but only signed the deed of release to formally accept the payment a year later.

He told the Royal Commission he considered himself “lucky” compared to other victims because he had learned how to cope and recognise what triggered his emotions.

Chrissie Foster was the first witness to give evidence at the Royal Commission on Monday, blaming serial paedophile Kevin O’Donnell for the death of her eldest daughter Emma and the lifelong injuries sustained by her daughter Katie in a car accident.

O’Donnell preyed on both girls while he was a parish priest at Oakleigh’s private Sacred Heart primary school in the 1980s.

Emma received an offer of $50,000 in compensation from the Melbourne Response, which was then the maximum amount offered to victims of abuse.

The pair received three letters in the same envelope in August 1998. One was an apology from Archbishop George Pell, with another from the church’s lawyers at Corrs Chambers Westgarth, which said they hoped the counselling from Carelink would be a “realistic alternative to litigation that will be otherwise strenuously defended”.

“I felt there was an apology and then a threat. It was more of the same from the Catholic Church,” Ms Foster said.

She and her husband Anthony Foster were refused compensation for themselves in 1998.

Mr O’Callaghan, she said, found that Emma had been abused and told the couple that he believed Katie had also been abused, but when they took civil action against the Church in the Supreme Court, all defendants denied their abuse and subsequent injuries.

They later settled for $750,000, which she said was inadequate to reflect the pain and suffering caused to her family, but acknowledged this was far greater than most victims received.

“Nothing about this process was transparent,” she said.

The Fosters said the legal system was a “far superior” alternative to the Melbourne Response for victims of clerical abuse, and called for reforms to allow victims to access “full and just compensation” through the courts.

“Church’s investigator grilled on independence”& related articles

$
0
0

The Sydney Morning Herald

Date

Cameron Houston, Jane Lee

The Catholic Church’s independent commissioner was unable to explain how he received confidential information from a victim of serial paedophile priest Kevin O’Donnell or why it was passed on to the church’s lawyers in an apparent breach of confidentiality.

The Royal Commission also raised concerns about the independence of Peter O’Callaghan, QC, who has investigated allegations of clerical abuse for the past 18 years under the church’s controversial Melbourne Response.

The church’s law firm Corrs Chambers Westgarth was also questioned over its handling of files and sensitive information from three separate arms of the Melbourne Response, which claim to be independent of each other.

Corrs Chambers Westgarth partner Richard Leder denied any confidentiality had been compromised in his role as lawyer for the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne and the Melbourne Response, which he helped establish in 1996.

But Royal Commission chairman Justice Peter McLellan appeared unconvinced.

“You must have Chinese walls inside your head,” Justice McLellan said.

Mr Leder was heckled by several victims attending the Royal Commission on Wednesday when asked why complainants had been forced to waive their common law rights in order to receive ex gratia payments of up to $50,000 under the Melbourne Response.

Mr Leder insisted the payments gave victims “finality”, despite acknowledging they could have received significantly higher compensation if they had successfully sued the church.

Again, commission chairman Justice McLellan seemed unpersuaded.

“Why is it a benefit for someone to forgo their common law rights in return for a modest sum of money? Can you understand that this is a scheme that protects the church unfairly?” Justice McLellan said.

Mr O’Callaghan again faced accusations from counsel assisting the commission that he failed to encourage victims of their “continuing and unfettered” right to report clerical abuse to police.

In correspondence to one victim, known as AFA, Mr O’Callaghan warned he would stop investigating complaints against convicted paedophile priest Father Michael Glennon if the complainant went to police. Glennon abused at least 21 boys over 32 years as a parish priest.

“There’s a real prospect for such a notorious fellow, that the court would find that he has done his time”, Mr O’Callaghan said to the victim.

Mr O’Callaghan denied the claim and said there were “tonnes of files” that demonstrated he had urged complainants to report to the police.

“I want to reject any suggestion that I discouraged people from going to the police. I certainly have a desire that child abusers be brought to justice,” he told the commission.

_____________________________________

Church denies buying victims’ legal rights

The Age (Australia)

Date

Angus Livingston and Patrick Caruana

The Catholic Church denies buying off sexual abuse victims for a modest sum to avoid being sued, but says it understands why people believe it did.

Hundreds of victims of pedophile priests signed away their rights to sue the church for compensation payments under its Melbourne Response scheme for handling clergy sex abuse complaints.

Melbourne archdiocese lawyer Richard Leder denies the church sought to discourage victims from taking legal action.

He told the child abuse royal commission the Melbourne Response was not an arrangement for protecting the church.

“I don’t agree, but I can see that people say that,” Mr Leder told the commission on Wednesday.

When asked why victims should forgo their legal rights in exchange for a modest sum, Mr Leder said it brought finality for both the church and victim.

Mr Leder said the scheme dealt with claims that would not have stood up in court.

“What victims give up when they sign the release is a legal claim that’s unlikely to succeed,” he said.

Commission chair Justice Peter McClellan asked Mr Leder if people with stronger claims might also be put off suing the church.

“Yes, I can see that,” he replied.

It was now clear the Melbourne Response’s capped payouts, which now stand at $75,000, did not meet the intended purpose of providing a financial recognition of the harm suffered by victims, Mr Leder said.

He conceded the church’s stated position of “strenuously defending” any civil action would frighten the average person, drawing jeers from the public gallery.

He said the phrase was aimed at deterring one unscrupulous lawyer, but was used throughout the Melbourne Response.

Mr Leder revealed the church hierarchy had considered in 1996 the option of creating a legal entity for the purpose of being sued, but decided instead to design the Melbourne Response.

He said the church’s approach had changed in the 18 years since.

“(It is) the sheer number of victims, but (also) a much greater understanding of the long-term effects of abuse,” Mr Leder said.

Cardinal George Pell, who set up the Melbourne Response, told the royal commission earlier this year he now believes the church should be able to be sued.

A Victorian parliamentary inquiry last year recommended the Catholic Church be incorporated so it could be sued.

The commission heard an official at Catholic Church Insurance believed independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan QC, appointed to investigate complaints, wasn’t scrutinising victims enough and relied on their accounts too much.

“There is no investigation other than the pitiful interviews conducted by the independent commissioner, which are seldom more than an account of the events as given by the claimant,” Laurie Rolls, of the church’s insurance body, said in a letter.

Mr O’Callaghan said the process of his investigations was not included in the reports sent to the Catholic Church.

“I think this is the first time I have ever seen (Mr Rolls’ letter). I reject it,” Mr O’Callaghan said.

Cardinal Pell will appear before the commission via video-link from Rome on Thursday afternoon.

_____________________________

Child sexual abuse royal commission: O’Callaghan advised abuse victims on strength of cases

ABC News (Australia)

Updated

The man in charge of the Catholic Church’s so-called Melbourne Response to allegations of child abuse has rejected suggestions he failed to encourage victims to go to police.

Peter O’Callaghan QC has been dealing with complainants and deciding whether they are eligible for compensation since the scheme began in 1996.

He was repeatedly questioned about the legal integrity of his decision-making at today’s hearing of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

Mr O’Callaghan has been a Queen’s Counsel for 40 years and said the Melbourne Response was based in canon law and “natural justice”.

He said when there was a dispute with a claim he would take on a role similar to a magistrate in a criminal case.

He was again asked repeatedly why he did not report cases of abuse to Victoria Police and why he took it upon himself to advise victims on the potential strength of their cases.

The case of Paul Hersbach, who was abused by the priest who also abused his father, uncle and brother was raised.

I want to reject any perception that I have, at any stage, sought to discourage people from going to the police.

Peter O’Callaghan QC

 

Mr O’Callaghan told Mr Hersbach his memory appeared to be hazy and “there would not appear to be much point in taking the matter to the police… however, that is a matter for you”.

Mr O’Callaghan also acknowledged he had not asked the priest about the allegations.

He defended his approach and told the commission if he “held a reasonable opinion that they may have difficulty sustaining that approach to the police”, he “thought it appropriate” to let them know.

“I want to reject any perception that I have, at any stage, sought to discourage people from going to the police,” Mr O’Callaghan said.

“I certainly have the desire that child abusers are brought to justice.”

Yesterday he told the commission he had made more than 330 adverse findings against priests within the Melbourne archdiocese since the complaint’s procedure began.

The church has paid out more than $17 million to abuse victims through the scheme.

But victims were told if they chose to go to police, they were no longer eligible for compensation.

Current compensation cap not adequate

Richard Leder, who has been the church’s lawyer since 1992, took the stand next.

He is a partner of Melbourne law firm Corrs Chambers Westgarth, which has represented the Catholic Church for 50 years.

Mr Leder designed the Melbourne Response with Archbishop George Pell in 1996.

He told the commission about how he began defending the church and the Melbourne archdiocese against claims of abuse from 1992.

“The view was taken that defendants did not have legal responsibility for the illegal acts of priests,” he said.

Mr Leder said that view extended to a program that provided counselling services to victims.

“At the time, even this involved controversy as there was concern that providing counselling services may be taken to be some form of tacit admission of liability,” he said.

Mr Leder said he believed it was a commonly held view of parishioners and figures in the church that they “did not put money in the plate each Sunday in order to pay for the criminal acts of priests”.

He also gave his understanding of the nature of the offences complained of by victims.

“It’s the nature of paedophilia that if a paedophile is attracted to one child it’s entirely probable that they will be indiscriminate,” Mr Leder said.

Mr Leder also acknowledged the Melbourne Response’s current cap of $75,000 could be perceived as not being adequate for the pain and suffering caused to victims.

“As things stand today it is clear that for some victims the ability to receive only up to $75,000 in lump sum compensation indicates that the compensation of the Melbourne Response is not achieving the objective that was set out,” he said.

“It was set out to achieve in terms of delivering a recognition – a financial recognition of the harm, and I’m absolutely supportive of the commitments that the Archbishop (Denis Hart) has made to review the matter.”

____________________________

Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response commissioner expected complaints process to take six months

The Age (Victoria, Australia)

Date

Jane Lee and Cameron Houston

Abuse commissioner expected quick resolution

Peter O’Callaghan, QC, was in 1996 appointed the Independent Commissioner of the Catholic Church’s Melbourne Response to clergy sexual abuse allegations and initially thought he could process the cases within six months. 

The man who determined whether the Catholic Church should compensate Melbourne clergy abuse victims for almost 20 years thought it would only take six months to handle all their complaints.

Peter O’Callaghan, QC, was appointed the Independent Commissioner of the church’s Melbourne Response – its internal process for handling abuse victims’ complaints – for a six-month term in 1996.

Mr O’Callaghan, who appeared at the Royal Commission in Melbourne on Tuesday, said he told the church’s solicitors and Archbishop Hart that he was optimistic the investigations could be concluded in a short time-frame.

“I was all for expediency if I could achieve it,” he said.

After almost two decades and over 351 complaints, Mr O’Callaghan, QC, conceded his initial estimate was “utopian”.

He said he had received about five complaints in recent weeks, including one after the Royal Commission had finished its first session in Melbourne on Monday.

Victims have criticised Mr O’Callaghan of discouraging them from reporting their alleged abuse to police and of lacking compassion in their interviews.

During insistent questioning from Chair of the Commission Justice Peter McLellan and supporting counsel Gail Furness, SC, he was pressed on whether he believed the church’s cap on compensation – currently capped at $75,000 – was appropriate.

Mr O’Callaghan, a barrister since 1961, acknowledged that victims would have received far more compensation if they pursued civil action than if they sought ex-gratia payments from the Melbourne Response.

Justice McLellan asked him, given his experience as a barrister: “Did you think that was truly the appropriate measure for the church to adopt when dealing with people who were damaged by members of the church?”

Mr O’Callaghan claimed he’d never given it any thought: “I didn’t think it was inappropriate and I didn’t think it was my business to worry about it.”

He noted that the cap was in line with Victims of Crime legislation at the time, which is funded by the state government, and that the compensation panel decided the exact amount to award victims, not him.

The average amount of compensation awarded victims since 1996 is $31,600.

Most of the complaints – 326 – brought by victims to have been upheld by the Melbourne Response.

Mr O’Callaghan was unable to answer a number of questions put to him, including the number of alleged clerical offenders, or how many had been referred to police.

“I’m not a good counter, I’ll have to get some help overnight,” he said.

He has agreed to provide additional information when the Royal Commission resumes tomorrow.

__________________________________

Catholic priests encouraged victims of abuse to go the police, the church tells the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

The Catholic Church encouraged abuse victims to go to the police, the Royal Commission in

The Catholic Church said its priests encouraged abuse victims to go to the police, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has heard. Picture: Jeremy Piper

VICTIMS of sexual abuse by Catholic priests were repeatedly encouraged to make formal complaints to police, but rarely did, the child abuse royal commission has heard.

Melbourne Response independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan QC told the commission today many victims didn’t want to name offenders to police.

Mr O’Callaghan told the hearing he didn’t pass matters to police because victims didn’t ask him to and he didn’t want to breach their confidentiality.

Just 119 of the 326 upheld complaints have been dealt with by police since the Melbourne Response, the church’s internal compensation panel, was started in 1996.

Mr O’Callaghan is being grilled as part of the commission’s examination of the Melbourne Response scheme.

It has been widely slammed by victims and was last year heavily criticised during Victoria’s parliamentary inquiry into abuse by religious and other organisations.

Victims told the royal commission they felt betrayed by the church’s Melbourne Response process, which they said lacked compassion, and called for the $75,000 cap on compensation payments to be scrapped.

A victim of paedophile priest Father Michael Glennon said Melbourne Response independent commissioner Peter O’Callaghan told him the prospects of Glennon doing any more jail time were low and he might not be charged.

“I felt Mr O’Callaghan was trying to discourage me from going to the police,” the man told the commission on Monday.

The man said he felt like he couldn’t win a court case against the church so he took a $50,000 payout, with no explanation for why the compensation was $25,000 less than the maximum.

“I did not think I had any other options for seeking compensation,” he said.

The commission heard today the church vowed, in a draft terms of reference, to actively encourage victims to report complaints to police.

“Immediately upon a complaint of sexual abuse being made to him the commissioner shall inform the complainant that he or she has an unfettered and continuing right to report the matter to police”.

Mr O’Callaghan said he believed every one of his recommendations were acted upon by church hierarchy.

But he said if he found no prima facie evidence after investigating allegations no further action would be taken.

The hearing continues.

shannon.deery@news.com.au

Viewing all 1993 articles
Browse latest View live